DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., 21 So. 2d 80.

25 citing documents.

  • Branum v. J. Ray Mcdermott & Co. 271 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    We note that in Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co, La.App, , which involved an injured shipfitter, the employee was declared totally and permanently disabled because of his inability to climb or go on scaffolds.
  • Pohl v. American Bridge Division US Steel Corp. 109 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    on of the meaning of total and permanent disability from Butzman *828 through Brannon, and in doing so reasoned thus: "The question, whether disability to perform some of the functions formerly performed should be considered as total disability or as partial disability, has vexed this Court for many years because, as is evidenced by our opinion in Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., Inc., La.App., , and in many subsequent cases, we were of the view that the Supreme Court had established the very
  • McAlister v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 87 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    198 , , affirming La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., Inc., La.App., ; Myers v. Jahncke Service, Inc., La.App., (writs refused).
  • Nubles v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 72 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    1943, ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., La.App.1945, ; Hecht v. Higgins Industries, La.App.1946, ; Stovall v. American Emp.
  • Reeve v. Clement-Braswell MacHine & Fab. Works 66 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    1945, ; Hecht v. Higgins Industries, La.App.1946, ; Stovall v. American Emp.
  • Brannon v. Zurich Gen. Accident & Liability Ins. 61 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    The question, whether disability to perform'some of the functions fofmerly performed should be considered as' total disability or as partial disability, has vexed this Court for many years because, as is evidenced by our opinion in' Biitzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., La.App., , and in many subsequent cases, we were of the view that the Supreme Court had established the very rule which, in Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., supra, it has disapproved, and had held that there is total disa
  • Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. 59 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    538 , ; Lee v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Richardson v. American Employers’ *388 Insurance Company, La.App., ; Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer, Inc., La.App.
  • Saltzman v. Lone Star Cement Corp. 55 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Almost identical situations were found in Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, La.App., , and in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 208 La.
  • Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co. 47 So. 2d 739 La. 1950
    538 , ; Lee v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., et al., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Richardson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company et al., La.App., ; Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer, Inc., et al., La.App., .
  • Willet v. American Automobile Ins. Co. 42 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Brown v. Continental Oil Company, La.
  • Boling v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation 42 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Brown v. Continental Oil Company, La.
  • Crawford v. Maryland Casualty Co. 39 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., et al., ; Sutcliffe v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours and Company, La.
  • Bailey v. Maryland Casualty Co. 34 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 188 La.
  • Anderson v. H. H. Machine Shop 32 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co. 32 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 188 La.
  • Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 188 La.
  • Guillot v. Weaver Brothers Thompson Lumber Co. 31 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Custer v. New Orleans Paper Box Factory, Inc., et al., La.
  • De Kerlegand v. Car General Ins. Corporation 30 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co. et al., supra.
  • Jacobson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 30 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • St. Alexandre v. Texas Co. 28 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., and Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., and Maryland Casualty Co., La.
  • Washington v. Independent Ice Cold Storage Co. 29 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , or Kanatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • Stovall v. American Employers Ins. Co. 26 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., ; Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 188 La.
  • Hecht v. Higgins Industries 25 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Henry v. Higgins Industries 24 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., or Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.
  • Falgoust v. Maryland Casualty Co. 22 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    The District Judge, in concluding that plaintiff was entitled to recover for total permanent disability, .