Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Raziano v. Clancy, 24 So. 2d 402.

13 citing documents.

  • Stein v. American Employers' Insurance 216 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Another approach to the question, partic-larly pertinent if plaintiff is considered a common laborer, is the question whether the injury makes him unable to compete with other, able-bodied laborers in securing employment; , (La.App.1946); Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Co., 211 La.
  • Green v. Harper 103 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    211 , ; Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corp., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
  • Kimbrell v. Travelers Insurance Co. 83 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    538 , ; Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corporation, La.App.1949, ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App.1946, ; Washington v. Independent Ice.
  • Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. 59 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    538 , ; Lee v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Richardson v. American Employers’ *388 Insurance Company, La.App., ; Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer, Inc., La.App.
  • Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co. 47 So. 2d 739 La. 1950
    538 , ; Lee v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., et al., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Richardson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company et al., La.App., ; Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer, Inc., et al., La.App., .
  • Weber v. Kieckhefer Container Co. 45 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    783 ; Sumrall v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., La.App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co. et al., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
  • Young v. Central Surety Insurance Corporation 41 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1949
  • Boulanger v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 31 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Guillot v. Weaver Brothers Thompson Lumber Co. 31 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , 404, only requires that it be found: "that plaintiff was a common laborer and can no longer engage in the kind of labor in which he had earned his living prior to the occurrence of this accident * * *."
  • De Kerlegand v. Car General Ins. Corporation 30 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Co. 30 So. 2d 758 La. 1947
  • Mitchell v. T. J. Moss Tie Co. 27 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Washington v. Independent Ice Cold Storage Co. 29 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App. Orleans, , 404, which contains the following statement: "We think it very obvious that the plaintiff, even if it be conceded that he had not developed any expertness in any specialty or trade and was therefore only a common laborer, could no longer compete with other able-bodied laborers in the securing of employment.