Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Storm v. Johnson, 23 So. 2d 639.
- Jacks v. Banister Pipelines America 418 So. 2d 524 La. 1982
-
Bolton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
245 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
held the same as to an electric slicing machine in a restaurant.
-
Hughes v. Chrysler Corp.
216 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
498 , ; Marshall v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., La.App., ; Veillon v. Sylvester, La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
Gulf States Utilities Company v. Guidry
183 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
132 ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Switzerland General Ins.
-
Levy v. Fort
178 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
751 , ; Morello v. Viola, La.App., ; Ensminger v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
Leleau v. Jacomine
144 So. 2d 921
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
To support this contention the plaintiff relies on several cases, among them Stephens, for Use and Benefit of Stephens v. Catalano, La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., , and Scott v. Dalton Co., La.App., .
-
Anderson v. Continental Can Company
141 So. 2d 48
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
1 Cir., 1951) ; Storm v. Johnson (Orl.App.1943) ; Smith v. Turner Lumber Co. (La.App.
-
Effler v. Edwards
142 So. 2d 599
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
A business may be classified as non-hazardous but its operation may involve what has been called ‘hazardous features’, and an employee engaged in the performance of duties requiring him to come in contact with such hazardous features is entitled to recovery of compensation, Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Rigsby v. John W. Clark Lumber Co., La.App., .
-
Miller v. General Chemical Division
128 So. 2d 39
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Co., La.App., ; Cooper v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company
99 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
" , , also decided by the Orleans Parish Court of Appeal.
-
Jackson v. Steel Fabricators
90 So. 2d 397
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Co., La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Smith v. Turner Lumber Co., La.App., 174 So.
-
Hammer v. Lazarone
87 So. 2d 765
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Neither was the employee here required to operate an electric slicing machine as was the employee in Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
O'CONNOR v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.
87 So. 2d 16
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Co., La.App., ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Smith v. Turner Lumber Co., La.App., 174 So.
-
Evans v. Louisiana State Board of Education
85 So. 2d 669
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Falgoust v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., , Storm v. Johnson, La.App., , Breland v. Rainold Van Denburgh, La.App., , and Hebert v. Gates, La.App., .
-
Cooper v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.
80 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
23:1223; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
Crow v. Hosier
66 So. 2d 380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
It has never been held that farming is per se hazardous We said in the last-cited case: “A business may be classified as nonhazardous but its operation may involve what has been called ‘hazardous features’, and an employee engaged in the performance of duties requiring him to come in contact with such hazardous features is entitled to recovery of compensation, Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Rigsby v. John W. Clark Lumber Company, La.App., .” We conclude after review of all the testimony, including
-
Troquille v. Lacaze's Estate
59 So. 2d 505
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
A business may be classified as non-hazardous but its operation may involve what has been called "hazardous features", and an employee engaged in the performance of duties requiring him to come in contact with such hazardous features is entitled to recovery of compensation, Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Rigsby v. John W. Clark Lumber Co., La.App., .
-
Harrington v. Franklin's Stores Corp. of New Iberia
55 So. 2d 647
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Also Storm v. Johnson, La.App., .
-
Morgan v. Standard Accident Ins.
51 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
699, 701 ; Storm v. Johnson, La.App., ; Hughes v. Enloe, La.App., .