Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Custer v. Higgins Industries, 24 So. 2d 511.

17 citing documents.

  • Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 551 So. 2d 1282 La. 1989
    2d Cir.1953) (gangrenous condition of long standing in left leg, eventual amputation unavoidable; sudden strain during employment made amputation immediately necessary; compensation awarded); (La.App.Orl.Cir.
  • Geist v. Martin Decker Corp. 313 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In this connection, Custer v. Higgins Industries, Inc., et al., involved an employee who died of a ruptured malignant tumor.
  • Funderburk v. Calcasieu Paper Co. 261 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App., ; Biggs v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., La.App., 170 So.
  • Smith v. New Amsterdam Casualty Insurance 173 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In the case of Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App., , there was no question but that the normal duty of forcing a window open by placing his elbows on his stomach caused the rupture of plaintiff’s abdominal tumor to become symptomatic.
  • Seals v. Potlatch Forests, Inc. 151 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    1 Cir., (non-malignant tumor); Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App.Orl., ; Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co., La.App.
  • Velotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 134 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    589 , L.R.A.1918F, 862; Lyons v. Swift & Company, La.App.2d Cir., 1956, (writs denied); Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App.Orleans, 1946, ; Causey v. Kansas City Bridge Co., La.App.
  • Andrepont v. Calcasieu Paper Company 131 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    There it was said, quoting from Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App., , that "`* * * disability * * * may be precipitated by a relatively slight accident event affecting cancer, arteriosclerosis, arthritis, tuberculosis, prostatitis, among others.'" [ ] And "` * * * the principle * * * has been extended to cases where the only disabling effect of the accident is to arouse o
  • George v. United Fruit Co. 131 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Circello v. Haas & Haynie Corp., La.App., ; Washington v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, La.App., ; Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App., .
  • Pixley v. Employers' Mutual Liability Insurance 102 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    1946, ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App.1947, ; Lacy v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, La.App.1956, .
  • Lacy v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin 86 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    730 ; Custer v. Higgin’s Industries, Inc., La.App.1946, ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App.
  • Lyons v. Swift & Company 86 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    App.] ) is particularly indicative of the wide scope of the protection which is afforded deficient employees under the Act.
  • Jarnagin v. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. 83 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    We have not overlooked the conclusion reached nor the reasons given in Custer v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., , in which we affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, although there had been no accident as the word “accident” is usually understood.
  • Stuckey v. City of Alexandria 81 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    683 ; Custer *48 v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., 1946, ; and Biggs v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., Inc., La.App., 1936, 170 So.
  • Williams v. Harris 77 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Custer v. Higgins Industries, La.App., .
  • Taylor v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. 65 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    730 ; Custer v. Higgin's Industries, Inc., La.App., 1946, ; Vautrot v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., 1947, .
  • Martin v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 35 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Distinguished Dempsey v. Pace 29 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , and Hill v. J. B. Beaird Corp., La.