Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gross v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co., 25 So. 2d 837.

16 citing documents.

Demeritt v. Trahan 755 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir.1946); Gross v. [Great] Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Pierson v. Sterling Sugars, Inc., 149 So.
Skains v. Tidwell 359 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
2d Cir., 1965) and Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Matthews v. Sno's Seafood & Steak House, Inc. 356 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
ERROR NO. 3 Irrespective of the fact that the Trial Judge relied on the cases of Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Morneau v. American Oil Company 272 So. 2d 313 La. 1973
1st Cir. 1943); Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Baughman v. Wells 171 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
The jurisprudence of this State appropriate to the issues presented here was reviewed in Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., -840 (1946 — cert, denied), wherein Judge Jan-vier, as the author of the opinion, stated: “There are, of course, innumerable cases touching upon the effect in a tort action or in a criminal prosecution for assault of provocative words.
Moore v. Travelers Insurance Co. 143 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Counsel for plaintiff cites the case of Gross v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, La.App., .
Velotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 132 So. 2d 51 La. 1961
Co., La.App., ; Gore v. Haynes, La.App., ; Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., ; Pierson v. Sterling Sugars, Inc., La.App., 149 So.
Velotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 126 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
ection provides: *447 "In determining whether or not an employer shall be exempt from and relieved of paying compensation because of injury sustained by an employee for the causes and reasons set forth in this Section, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer.” This statutory provision received careful consideration in Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App.Orleans, 1946, .
Wells v. Perkins 101 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
627, 629 ; Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App.1946, .
Davis v. Maddox 100 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
632 and in Bacas v. Laswell, La.App., , are consistent with this conclusion.’ “The ruling in Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., , has been referred to with approval in Jenkins v. Cities Service Refining Corporation, La.App., and Conley v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App., .” Robertson v. Palmer, La.App., , at page 410, expresses our opinion upon this point as: “It is well established, as the jurisprudence
Freeman v. Clark 88 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App.1946, , the court held that mere verbal provocations, unless they are extremely serious, should not be considered in a compensation proceeding as the commencement of an affray resulting in injury to compensation claimant, but the court should look to the first physical act or the first threat of violence accompanied by appa
Cater v. Travelers Insurance Company 83 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App.1946, .
Smith v. Parker 59 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
627, 629 ; Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App., 1946, .
Conley v. Travelers Ins. Co. 53 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
Counsel for defendant relies, inter alia, upon the case of Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, La.App., .
Jenkins v. Cities Service RefinIng Corp. 44 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
No compensation shall be allowed for an injury caused (1) by the injured employee’s wilful intention-to injure himself or to injure another * * One of the leading recent cases on this point is the case of Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., , wherein considerable Louisiana jurisprudence was reviewed and which is, in our opinion, authority that no recovery can be had herein by the plaintiff from either of the defendants.
Burkhardt v. City of Monroe 37 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
App., ; Morvant v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co., La.