Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Daigle v. Higgins Industries, 29 So. 2d 374.
-
Lewing v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc.
350 So. 2d 1320
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
23:1206; Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, (La.App.
- Gonzales v. Coastal Wire Warehouse, Inc. 328 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
-
Murphy v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
165 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
228 ; Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., .
-
Cruthirds v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
159 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., ; Schum v. Marion T. Fannaly, Inc., La.App., ; Beloney v. General Electric Supply Co., La.App., .
-
Saltalamacchia v. Strachan Shipping Corp.
156 So. 2d 291
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., ; Armen v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, La.App., .
-
Spencer v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
152 So. 2d 215
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
App., ; Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., ; Annen v. Standard Oil of New Jersey, La.App., .
-
Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Co.
130 So. 2d 470
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Malone’s Work, and Daigle v. Higgins [La.App., ] were also cited, and the court held that the employer was allowed credit for nine weeks’ wages earned by the injured employee, while working for his former employer at the same time, with the same duties, and at the same rate of pay.
-
Pope v. Coney
119 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
8 , , Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., .
-
Smith v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
116 So. 2d 730
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
*733 This rule was followed in Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., , and the employer was allowed credit though the wages had been fully earned.
-
Delouche v. City of Monroe
84 So. 2d 259
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
-
Scalise v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
84 So. 2d 88
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Orleans, ; Gautreau v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App.
-
Myers v. Jahncke Service
76 So. 2d 436
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
The identical issue raised by this appeal was presented to this court in the case of Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., and , which involved a workman who had sustained injuries which rendered him permanently disabled from doing work of any reasonable character.
-
Soudelier v. Travelers Ins. Co.
72 So. 2d 771
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
743 , and Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., .
-
Sharp v. Esso Standard Oil Co.
72 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Daigle v. Higgins Industries, La.App., ; Goodman v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc., La.App., .
-
Schum v. Marion T. Fannaly, Inc.
59 So. 2d 135
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Bailey v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., .” Appellant assigns several errors, all having to do with the question of veracity of the witnesses.
-
Blackwell v. Wimberly
53 So. 2d 814
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
1003 , ; Langston v. Hanbury, La.App., ; Daigle v. Higgins Industries Inc., La.App., .
-
Goodman v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc.
49 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
In the case of Daigle v. Higgins Industries, Inc., et al., , decided by the Orleans Court of Appeal, relied upon by the district court, and now by the appellee, it was held that under facts similar to those existing in the present case, credit was due the employer for the period the injured employee was paid wages, whether earned or not.
-
Bailey v. Maryland Casualty Co.
34 So. 2d 354
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
App., , 379, we said: "In short, we take the view that if, during that period for which compensation is due, the injured workman can earn a substantial living by working for the same employer at wages approximating those earned before the accident, the weeks for which he should earn such wages should be deducted from the 40
- McClung v. Delta Shipbuilding Co. 33 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
-
Arbo v. Maryland Casualty Co.
29 So. 2d 380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , and were passed on by us in an opinion handed down in said case this day on rehearing, and for the reasons therein stated the defendant in the present case should be allowed further credit of $600 on the judgment, being $20 for each of the thirty weeks between September 4, 1944, and April 4, 1945, that plaintiff wor