DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Michelli v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 34 So. 2d 264.

47 citing documents.

  • Stamper v. Allstate Insurance Co. 223 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Robichaux v. Wyse 216 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Wheeler v. Simonton 215 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Wallace v. Travelers Insurance Company 195 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Co., La.App., ; Leroy v. Methvin, La.App., ; Roy v. Broussard, La.App., .
  • Kimball v. Landreneau 170 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Arnold v. Olinde Hardware & Supply Co. 150 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bergeron 148 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    2d 409 (1960); Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., (1950); Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, La.App., (1948).
  • Roberts v. London Guarantee & Accident Co. 140 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Orleans, 1948, ; Codifer v. Occhipinti, La.App.
  • Deshotels v. United States Fire Insurance Company 132 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.
  • Liddell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 128 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Co., La.App., ; Great American Ins.
  • Bouwell v. Marquette Casualty Company 125 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • McKay v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company 123 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Madison v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 120 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Home Ins.
  • Kirby v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 110 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Womack v. Travelers Insurance Co. 106 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Johnson v. Wilson 97 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Orleans, , to the effect that the excessive speed of the other vehicle involved in an accident with a left-turning driver was not a contributory proximate cause of the accident therein involved.
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 98 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Edwards v. Walker 97 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Company, La.App., and Cone v. Smith, La.App., .
  • Leonard v. Holmes & Barnes, Limited 94 So. 2d 241 La. 1957
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Firemen's Insurance 94 So. 2d 295 La. 1957
    Co., La.App., ; Malone v. Fletcher, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Wallace 92 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • Castille v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance 92 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Co., [La.App.], ; Labarre v. Booth, [La.App.]
  • Jenkins v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 92 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    As was stated in the case of Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, La.App., , 268: "It is well settled in Louisiana that the operator of a motor vehicle who desires to make a left turn, carries the responsibility of being certain that the turn can be made without danger to normal overtaking or oncoming traffic, and he must yield the right of way to such vehicles."
  • American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Massa 87 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Co., La.App., , we said: , * We believe, however, that the speed of the Michelli car was not a, contributing cause of the accident, .
  • Nichols v. Everist 80 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
  • Tyler v. Marquette Casualty Company 79 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    See: Home Insurance Company v. Warren, La.App., 1947, ; Bonstaff v. Hawkins, La.App., 1947, ; Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, La.App., 1948, ; Myers v. Landry, La.
  • Callia v. Rambin 78 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
  • Hebert v. Hatch 75 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co. [La.App.], ; Harris v. Bigby [La.App.], and Lane v. Bourgeois [La.App.], 28 So.
  • Gay v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 76 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
  • Bagala v. Kimble 74 So. 2d 172 La. 1954
    Co., La.App., ; Picou v. J. B. Luke's Sons, 204 La.
  • Cabral v. Totaro 73 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., , and cases therein cited.” The defendant Totaro could not reasonably expect traffic moving on a main and right of way thoroughfare to stop or even slow down beyond the maximum allowable speed at every cross street on which an automobile might be upon a wide neutral ground such as Carrollton Avenue.
  • Terrell v. Fargason 67 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Messina v. Audubon Ins. Co. 67 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Co., La.App., ; Muse v. Chambley, La.App., .
  • Potomac Ins. v. City of Alexandria 66 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    App., ; Interurban Transportation Co. v. F. Strauss & Sons, La.App., 196 So.
  • Graves v. Riser 62 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Co., La.App., 1948, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, ; Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corporation v. Ritter, La.App., 1948, ; Toney v. Burris, La.App., 1950, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Thomas, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v. Maricelli, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v
  • Hutchinson v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 60 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Co., La.App., , also cited by counsel for plaintiff, was the speed of the plaintiff’s car.
  • Bagley v. T. E. Mercer Teaming & Trucking Contractor 59 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    The principle is well stated in Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, La.App., , as follows: “It is a well defined rule of law that he who by his negligence creates a dangerous situation is liable to one who, acting as a reasonably prudent person would act, is injured while attempting to avoid the created danger.” For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’
  • Codifer v. Occhipinti 57 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1952
    Co., La.App., ; Murray v. Kaufman, La.App., .
  • Strug v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford 53 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    form and that fhe responsibility for seeing that such a turn can be made is placed on the motorist making the left turn and he should be certain that it can be made without danger to normal overtaking or oncoming traffic, citing, Swinney v. Primeaux, La.App., ; Fidelity & ; Michelli v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, La.App., ; and Home Insurance Company v. Warren, La.App., .
  • Myers v. Maricelli 50 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
  • Myers v. Landry 50 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Co., La.App., , and cases therein cited.
  • Toney v. Burris 45 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Co., La.App., ; Gomez v. Broussard, La.App., ; Lane v. Bourgeois, La.App., 28 So.
  • Chapman v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 45 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Co., La.App., ; Gomez v. Broussard, La.App., ; Lane v. Bourgeois, La.App., ; ; Home Insurance Co. v. Warren, La.App., .
  • Malone v. Fletcher 44 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    App., ; Gomez v. Broussard, La.App., ; Lane v. Bourgeois, La.App., ; Seale v. Stephens, Employer Cas.
  • Delaune v. Crawford 39 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , page 268, to the effect that: "It is well settled in Louisiana that the operator of a motor vehicle who desires to make a left turn, carries the responsibility of being certain that the turn can be made without danger to normal overtaking or oncoming traffic, and he must yield the right of way to such vehicles.
  • Brousseau v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 34 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    The plaintiff, James C. Brousseau, brought this suit for $15,498.97 for personal injuries and expenses arising out of an automobile accident, against Rheem Manufacturing Company and American Automobile Insurance Company, and it was consolidated for trial with the case of Michelli versus the same defendants, , an opinion and decree in which was handed down by us this day.
  • Middleton v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 34 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    Joseph S. Middleton, plaintiff, for $3,060.00 to compensate him for personal injuries and medical expenses arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on October 9, 1939, at Kenner, Louisiana, against Rheem Manufacturing Company and its liability insurance carrier, American Automobile Insurance Company, was consolidated for trial with the action of Michelli versus these same defendants, , in which an opinion and decree was handed down by us this day.