Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tornabene v. Rau, 34 So. 2d 655.

16 citing documents.

  • Julian v. Ralph 206 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    490 ; Drewes v. Miller, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Alderman v. Henderson, La.App., ; Terrebonne v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., et al., La.App., ; National Motor Club of La., Inc. v. American Indemnity Co., La.App., ; Plotkin v. Martino, La.App., .
  • Petersen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 104 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Sullivan v. Locke, La.App., ; Codifer v. Occhipinti, La.App., McBroom v. Chavis, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Deffez v. Stephens, La.App., .
  • Jackson v. Fischbein 92 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Tornabene v. Rau, 1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., 1952, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Company, 1953, ; Fosberg v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, 1954, .
  • Dyck v. Maddry 81 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    Fosberg v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1954, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1953, ; Electric Delivery System, Inc., v. Lang Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1952, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1948, .
  • Lyles v. Scamardo 74 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App.
  • Fosberg v. Texas Mut. Ins. Co. 72 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.
  • Greengus v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. 71 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    See: Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App., 1952, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Co. of N. Y. v. Thomas, La.App., 1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Co., La.App., 1953, .
  • Guillot v. Jones 67 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    The case of Lucia v. De Lage, La.App., , relied on by plaintiff, in which we cited Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., , is not applicable.
  • Baggett v. Markel, Inc. 65 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App.1952, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Co. v. Thomas, La.App.1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, .
  • Martin v. Globe Indemnity Co. 64 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    App., 1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, .
  • Graves v. Riser 62 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Co., La.App., 1948, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, ; Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corporation v. Ritter, La.App., 1948, ; Toney v. Burris, La.App., 1950, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Thomas, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v. Maricelli, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v. Landry, La.App., 1951, .
  • Electric Delivery System, Inc. v. Lang Co. 61 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
  • Dixie Highway Express v. CC Galbraith & Son 61 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    490 ; Drewes v. Miller, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., .
  • EMPLOYERS'FIRE INS. CO. v. Rodgers 47 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
    With the observation of the District Judge on this point we are in complete accord, for the principle is now firmly imbedded in our jurisprudence and has been particularly enunciated in the following recent cases, Nezat v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., La.App., ; Golden v. Creole Delicacies, Inc., La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., .
  • Le Brun v. American Paper Mfg. Co. 41 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1949
    App., , 657, we found facts, concerning the use of a taxicab, very similar to those presented here, and there we said: "Plaintiff has been engaged in the business of operating a taxicab for about six years.
  • Lucia v. De Lage 36 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    * * *" , we were presented with a claim of a taxicab operator who was deprived of its use while it was undergoing repairs.