Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tornabene v. Rau, 34 So. 2d 655.
-
Julian v. Ralph
206 So. 2d 121
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
490 ; Drewes v. Miller, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Alderman v. Henderson, La.App., ; Terrebonne v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., et al., La.App., ; National Motor Club of La., Inc. v. American Indemnity Co., La.App., ; Plotkin v. Martino, La.App., .
-
Petersen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
104 So. 2d 224
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Sullivan v. Locke, La.App., ; Codifer v. Occhipinti, La.App., McBroom v. Chavis, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Deffez v. Stephens, La.App., .
-
Jackson v. Fischbein
92 So. 2d 602
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Tornabene v. Rau, 1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., 1952, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Company, 1953, ; Fosberg v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, 1954, .
-
Dyck v. Maddry
81 So. 2d 165
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Fosberg v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1954, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1953, ; Electric Delivery System, Inc., v. Lang Company, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1952, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., Orleans Circuit, 1948, .
-
Lyles v. Scamardo
74 So. 2d 774
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App.
-
Fosberg v. Texas Mut. Ins. Co.
72 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, ; Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.
-
Greengus v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins.
71 So. 2d 611
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
See: Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App., 1952, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Co. of N. Y. v. Thomas, La.App., 1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, ; Martin v. Globe Indemnity Co., La.App., 1953, .
-
Guillot v. Jones
67 So. 2d 501
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
The case of Lucia v. De Lage, La.App., , relied on by plaintiff, in which we cited Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., , is not applicable.
-
Baggett v. Markel, Inc.
65 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Electric Delivery System v. Lang Co., La.App.1952, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Co. v. Thomas, La.App.1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App.1948, .
-
Martin v. Globe Indemnity Co.
64 So. 2d 257
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
App., 1950, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, .
-
Graves v. Riser
62 So. 2d 163
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Co., La.App., 1948, ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., 1948, ; Fidelity & Guaranty Fire Corporation v. Ritter, La.App., 1948, ; Toney v. Burris, La.App., 1950, ; Zurich Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Thomas, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v. Maricelli, La.App., 1951, ; Myers v. Landry, La.App., 1951, .
-
Electric Delivery System, Inc. v. Lang Co.
61 So. 2d 607
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., ; Zurich Fire Ins.
-
Dixie Highway Express v. CC Galbraith & Son
61 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
490 ; Drewes v. Miller, La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., .
-
EMPLOYERS'FIRE INS. CO. v. Rodgers
47 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
With the observation of the District Judge on this point we are in complete accord, for the principle is now firmly imbedded in our jurisprudence and has been particularly enunciated in the following recent cases, Nezat v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., La.App., ; Golden v. Creole Delicacies, Inc., La.App., ; Tornabene v. Rau, La.App., .
-
Le Brun v. American Paper Mfg. Co.
41 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1949
App., , 657, we found facts, concerning the use of a taxicab, very similar to those presented here, and there we said: "Plaintiff has been engaged in the business of operating a taxicab for about six years.
-
Lucia v. De Lage
36 So. 2d 53
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
* * *" , we were presented with a claim of a taxicab operator who was deprived of its use while it was undergoing repairs.