DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., 37 So. 2d 452.

23 citing documents.

  • Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    74 (La.App.Orl.1940); (La.App.Orl.
  • Menard v. Associated Royal Crown Bottling Co. 249 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
  • Funderburk v. Millers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of Texas 228 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    This proposition was fully discussed by us in Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Company, La.App., .
  • Succession of Guidry v. Bank of Terrebonne & Trust Co. 193 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    2d 20 (La.App.1941); (La.
  • Durham v. Paciera 164 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    The case of Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Company, La.App., , holds as follows: “We must, therefore, hold that since young Pancoast was guilty of negligence which contributed to the accident, this negligence prevents recovery by the father, plaintiff in the main demand.” See also Epps v. Standard Supply and Hardware Company, La.App., .
  • Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 128 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    App. 2 Cir., ; Pancoast v. Co-operative Cab Co., La.App.Orleans, ; Porter, for and on Behalf of Porter v. DeBoisblanc, La.App.Orleans, ; Anderson v. Morgan City Canning *836 Co., Inc., La.App.Orleans, ; Chase v. Burley, La.App.
  • McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. 129 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    App. 2 Cir., ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App.Orleans, ; Porter for and on Behalf of Porter v. DeBoisblanc, La.App.
  • Joffre v. Ike Haggert MacHine Works 100 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    This proposition was fully discussed by us in Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Curry v. Fendt 94 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    For a full discussion of this proposition see Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Malter v. Blanke 88 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Huerstel v. L. Man-gano & Co., La.App., ; Pan-coast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Gayle v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., La.App., .
  • Ehtor v. Parish 86 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Chase v. Burley, La.App., ; Anderson v. Morgan City Canning Co., Inc., La.App., ; Porter, for and on Behalf of Porter v. De Boisblanc, La.App., ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Glen Falls Ins.
  • Toups v. Trent 85 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    See Sheehan v. Hanson-Flotte Co., La.App., ; Pancoast v. Cooperage Cab Co., La.App., .” See, also, Mansfield (Johnson) v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , and Velasquez v. Murray-Brooks, Inc., La.App., , in which we said: ' “The mere fact that Velasquez was able to drive his car into the intersection ahead of the truck does not indicate that he had preempted the int
  • Dyck v. Maddry 81 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    App., Orleans Circuit, 1948, ; Glen Falls Insurance Company v. Copeland, La.App., Second Circuit, 1946, .
  • Sampey v. Martin 80 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Co., La.App., , we said: “It is well settled that the owner of an automobile may recover for damage sustained by it in an accident to which the negligence of the borrower may have contributed.
  • Sonnier v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 79 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Co., La.App., , and authorities therein cited."
  • Anderson v. Morgan City Canning Co. 73 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Porter, for and on Behalf of Porter v. De Boisblanc, La.App., ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Glen Falls Ins.
  • Murray v. Dupepe 75 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., ; Sewell v. Newton, La.App., 152 So.
  • Emmco Ins. Co. v. Savoy 71 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, La.App., ; Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Allen, 1948, La.
  • Hay v. American Motorists Ins. 66 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In attempting to point the parallel, counsel cites Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., , reiterating the well-recognized general principle that the father is liable for the negligence of the minor residing with him, and the case of Quintano v. Ibos, 14 La.App.
  • McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish 66 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    109 , ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Company, La.App., 1948, ; Douglas v. Haro, 1949, 214 La.
  • H. & G. Furniture Co. v. Duhon 46 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    See Sheehan v. Hanson-Flotte Co., La.App., ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co., La.App., .” See also: Culver v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Driefus v. Levy, La.App., 140 So.
  • Facio v. Bellone 39 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Huerstel v. L. Mangano Co. 39 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , and authorities therein cited.