Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Etchison Drilling Co. v. Flournoy, 59 So. 867.
-
New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New Orleans
876 So. 2d 211
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Consequently, this is not a case of a law, or a distinct and separable part of a law, enacted in the unauthorized exercise of a power completely denied to the Legislature, , 59 So.
-
State v. Cousan
684 So. 2d 382
La. 1996
428 , (1941) ("A constitutional provision should be construed as having a prospective effect only unless it exhibits the intention of its framers to be given a retrospective effect."); , 59 So.
-
New Orleans, Etc. v. Civ. Service, Etc.
422 So. 2d 402
La. 1982
Consequently, this is not a case of a law, or a distinct and separable part of a law, enacted in the unauthorized exercise of a power completely denied to the Legislature, , 59 So.
- Plebst v. Barnwell Drilling Company 148 So. 2d 584 La. 1963
-
Terrebonne Parish School Board v. St. Mary Parish School Board
138 So. 2d 104
La. 1961
This situation, in which the legislative act pre-dates the formal effectiveness of the constitutional authority for such act, , 59 So.
- Gueno v. Medlenka 117 So. 2d 817 La. 1960
-
Cobb v. Louisiana Board of Institutions
111 So. 2d 126
La. 1959
If the objectionable and the unobjectionable provisions of a statute are not distinct and separable, to declare the one provision invalid and the other enforceable would be to substitute for the law as enacted one which the Legislature might not have been willing to enact.” , 59 So.
- State v. Alden Mills 12 So. 2d 204 La. 1943
- State v. Alden Mills 8 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- State v. Spence Goldstein 6 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Peck v. Tugwell 5 So. 2d 524 La. 1941
-
State Ex Rel. Chess & Wymond Co. v. Grace
175 So. 825
La. 1937
In the cases of Etchison Drilling Co. v. Flournoy, Tax Collector, , 59 So.
-
Calcasieu Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Reid
83 So. 384
La. 1919
The district court declared the statute unconstitutional for only one of the reasons alleged in plaintiffs’ petitions; that is, that this court had, in the case of Etchison Drilling Co. v. Flournoy, Tax Collector, , 59 South.