Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roussel v. Railways Realty Co., 62 So. 608.
- Champagne v. Champagne 541 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Perrault v. Edwards
129 So. 125
La. 1930
But “A rule for contempt is in the nature of a criminal prosecution; the court will not on such a rule determine the rights of the parties in the main litigation.” , 62 So.
- Roussel v. Railways Realty Co. 69 So. 27 La. 1915
- Gajan v. Patout & Burguieres 65 So. 17 La. 1914