Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., 64 So. 870.
-
Chestnut v. Hammatt
157 So. 2d 915
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The following language from “ , 64 So.
-
Sylvester v. Sylvester
137 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
LSA-Civil Code, Article 464; , 64 So.
-
Roberts v. Williams
99 So. 2d 392
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The principle was clearly enunciated in the oft-cited case of In re Receivership of Augusta Sugar Company, Ltd., , 64 So.
-
WM Bailey & Sons v. Western Geophysical Co.
66 So. 2d 424
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Plaintiff's contention is not supported by one of the cases cited on this point, Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., , 64 So.
-
Cristina Inv. Corporation v. Gulf Ice Co.
55 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
263 ; In re Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., 1914, , 64 So.
- Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Bell 165 So. 150 La. 1935
-
Folse v. Loreauville Sugar Factory, Inc.
156 So. 667
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In' this connection, it may be significant to observe that in the case of In re Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., Ltd., , 64 So.
- Caldwell v. Laurel Grove Co. 144 So. 718 La. 1932
- Caldwell v. Laurel Grove Co. 140 So. 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Hamilton Co. v. Medical Arts Building Co.
135 So. 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
In the recent case of Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., reported in , 64 So.
-
St. Mary Iron Works v. Community Mfg. Enterprise, Inc.
119 So. 564
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
The case In Receivership Augusta Sugar Co., , 64 So.
- Bain-Beaird Co. v. Bellevoir Co. 7 La. App. 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
-
Monroe Automobile & Supply Co. v. Cole
6 La. App. 337
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In re: Receivership of Augusta Sugar Co., Ltd. (Payne & Joubert M. & P. Co., Intervenors), , 64 South.
- Beard v. Larson 98 So. 556 La. 1923
- J. P. Hudson & Sons v. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co. 68 So. 129 La. 1915
- Followed Pratt Engineering & Machine Co. v. Cecelia Sugar Co. 65 So. 100 La. 1914