Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co., 64 So. 684.

21 citing documents.

Frey v. Amoco Production Co. 603 So. 2d 166 La. 1992
See Caddo Oil & , 64 So.
Sizeler Prop. Investors, Inc. v. Gordon Jewelry Corp. 544 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Morrison v. D & L PARTNERSHIP 499 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
These are Caddo Oil & , 64 So.
Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Millers 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
See also Caddo Oil & Mining Company v. Producers’ Oil Company, , 64 So.
Sohio Petroleum Company v. Miller 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
See also Caddo Oil & , 64 So.
Matheson v. Placid Oil Co. 33 So. 2d 527 La. 1947
Compare also Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 So.
Sabatier v. Canal Oil Co. 12 So. 2d 665 La. 1942
Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 So.
Branch v. Acme Homestead Ass'n 169 So. 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
In the syllabus of Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Company, So.
Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Grace 157 So. 393 La. 1934
711 , ; Nelson v. Barber, 143 La.
Chavez v. United Motor Car Co. 151 So. 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
711 , ; Nelson v. Barber, 143 La.
Sam George Fur Co. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipeline Co. 148 So. 51 La. 1933
Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 So.
United Carbon Co. v. Interstate Natural Gas Co. 147 So. 37 La. 1933
711 , ; Nelson v. Barber, 143 La.
Shreveport Laundries, Inc. v. Teagle 139 So. 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
711 , ; Nelson v. Barber, 143 La.
Smith v. Hereford 120 So. 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Caddo Oil Co. vs. Producer’s Oil Co., , 64 So.
Blanchard v. Haber 118 So. 117 La. 1928
711 , ; Nelson v. Barber, 143 La.
Conques v. Andrus 110 So. 93 La. 1926
The next case cited by defendants is Caddo Oil Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 So.
Pipes v. Payne 101 So. 144 La. 1924
Whatever ordinary knowledge and care would dictate, as to the proper thing to be done for the interest of the' lessor and lessee, under any given circumstances, is that which the law requires to be done, as an implied stipulation of the lease.” Thornton on Oil and Gas (2d Ed.) § 111; Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 South.
Lieber v. Ouachita Natural Gas & Oil Co. 95 So. 538 La. 1922
Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 South.
Nabors v. Producers' Oil Co. 74 So. 527 La. 1917
[4] In support of the third ground urged by the plaintiffs for demanding an annulment of the lease, that there was an implied obligation on the part of the lessee to drill more than one well within the time that had elapsed when this suit was filed, their counsel rely upon the decision of this court in the case of Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 South.
Cochran v. Gulf Refining Co. 72 So. 718 La. 1916
The case was tried on the issues set forth above; and, following the decision first rendered by this court in the case of Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 South.
Cooke v. Gulf Refining Co. 65 So. 758 La. 1914
Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 64 South.