Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thornhill v. Wear, 59 So. 909.

17 citing documents.

Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. BD. OF COM'RS FOR ATCHAFALAYA BASIN LEVEE DIST. 306 So. 2d 707 La. 1975
State ex rel. Harris v. Breit-Haupt 58 So. 2d 332 La. 1952
Ferguson v. Hayes' Heirs 13 So. 2d 223 La. 1943
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service 8 So. 2d 49 La. 1942
Landry v. Ozenne 195 So. 14 La. 1940
State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 182 So. 725 La. 1938
State ex rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority 182 So. 725 La. 1938
Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. Masling 171 So. 36 La. 1936
Tichenor v. Tichenor 167 So. 427 La. 1936
Chauvin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 148 So. 23 La. 1933
Southern Hide Co. v. Best 145 So. 682 La. 1932
Cambre v. Brignac 140 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
But Brignac contends that the prescriptive period does not apply when -the contest appears by reconven-tional demand, and,' in support of this view, *703 , 59 So.
McCann v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 139 So. 481 La. 1932
Campagna v. City of Baton Rouge 116 So. 403 La. 1928
Vidalia Bank & Trust Co. v. Purcell 8 La. App. 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Thornhill vs. Wear, , 59 So.
Pierson v. Times-Picayune Pub. Co. 88 So. 77 La. 1921
Turregano v. Whittington 61 So. 525 La. 1913