Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., 63 So. 122.

64 citing documents.

Octavio Diaz-molina v. Walter C. Flower, III La. 2023
819, (1967); Farley v. Frost–Johnson Lumber Co., So.
Yesterdays of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish Sales and Use Tax Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Joshua Terrell, Indiv. Etc. v. Town of Merryville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
CT Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc. 861 So. 2d 156 La. 2003
Alexis v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 604 So. 2d 581 La. 1992
art. 801(D)(3); , 63 So.
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
819 , 199 So.2d *727 886 (1967); , 63 So.
Lakeshore Property Owners v. Delatte 524 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Financial Corp. v. Estate of Cooley 447 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Burton v. Country Boys, Inc. 446 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
"The [Louisiana Supreme Court] , 63 So.
Dunn v. Pauratore 387 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In the landmark case of Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., supra [ , 63 So.
Matter of Succession of Vice 385 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Twillie v. HB Zachry Co. 380 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Cheatham v. City of New Orleans 378 So. 2d 369 La. 1979
Crawford v. Deshotels 359 So. 2d 118 La. 1978
Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
* * * In the landmark case of [ Farley v. ] Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., supra, [ , 63 So.
McCorkle v. Service Cab Co. 305 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
“It can not be revoked on a pretense of an error in law.” , 63 So.
J. H. Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 259 So. 2d 882 La. 1972
* * * ' In the landmark case of Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., supra, [ , 63 So.
D'Amico v. Canizaro 226 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
“The plea of estoppel and objection to the evidence should have been overruled.” , 63 So.
Succession of Robinson 218 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
182 (1936); Farley, , 63 So.
Jackson v. Gulf Insurance Company 199 So. 2d 886 La. 1967
Quinette v. Delhommer 165 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Prieto Lumber Co. v. Shoultz 111 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
In interpreting the provision of the foregoing codal article, , 63 So.
Succession of Valdez 44 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
Sun Oil Co. v. Smith 43 So. 2d 148 La. 1949
Jones v. Williams 39 So. 2d 746 La. 1949
De Maupassant v. Clayton 38 So. 2d 791 La. 1949
Slaton v. King 36 So. 2d 648 La. 1948
Janney v. Calmes 33 So. 2d 510 La. 1947
ly sound.” Further, in the opinion of that case we made reference to the confusion that had existed in the early jurisprudence of this court as a result of Civil Code, Article 2291, which provides that a judicial confession or a declaration in a judicial proceeding is full proof thereof against him who has made it, , 63 So.
Slaton v. King 30 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Hope v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. 5 So. 2d 138 La. 1941
Sanderson v. Frost 3 So. 2d 626 La. 1941
Little v. Barbe 198 So. 368 La. 1940
portant judicial declaration made in defense of the LaCaze suit; and, although the judicial declaration in such a case does not have the effect of an estoppel, according to article 2291 of the Civil Code, because it served no purpose in the suit in which it was made, it carries- some weight as evidence of the truth of the declaration, , 63 So.
O'Sullivan v. Knop 195 So. 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
Womack v. McCook Bros. Funeral Home 193 So. 652 La. 1940
Williams v. Brocato 194 So. 67 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1940
Gipson v. Gipson 192 So. 355 La. 1939
Southern United Ice Co. v. Rapides Grocery Co. 187 So. 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Jordan v. Crichton 186 So. 612 La. 1939
Article 2291, R.C.C.; , 63 So.
Orleans Plumbing Shop v. Morris 181 So. 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1938
Alsaya v. Johnson 178 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Calamia v. Mayer 174 So. 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Sheeren v. Gulf Ins. Co. of Dallas, Tex. 174 So. 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Aronson v. Pailet 173 So. 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Rembert v. Fenner & Beane 173 So. 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
H. J. Smith & Sons v. Joiner 172 So. 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Grosjean v. Cooney Petroleum Co. 167 So. 880 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1936
See Farley et al. v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. (Johnson & Weaver, Warrantors), , 63 So.
McWilliams v. Geddes & Moss Undertaking & Embalming Co. 164 So. 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
pages 540, et seq., 63 So.
Land v. Land 164 So. 599 La. 1935
Taylor v. Byrnes 151 So. 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Even if such reservation had not been made, these allegations could not give rise to any estoppel, , 63 So.
Succession of Coleman 128 So. 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
We are no longer free to consider which of the two lines of reasoning is the more sound, because we believe that the matter has been definitely settled by the Supreme Court in Farley vs. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., , 63 So.