Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boyd v. Bradley, 63 So. 883.
- Thevenet v. Clause 302 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
-
Manson Realty Company v. Plaisance
196 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
225 , , in which the Court said: "Counsel for defendant cites article 3444 of the Civil Code, under the title `Of Possession,' to the effect that the possessor is supposed to retain always his intention to retain possession, `unless a third person has usurped or taken from him the possession, or he has failed to exercise an
-
Broussard v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.
164 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
225 , ; Brashears et al. v. Chandler, La.App., 183 So.
-
Broussard v. Wisner
164 So. 2d 99
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
225 , ; Brashcars et al. v. Chandler, La.App., 183 So.
- Clark v. Richardson 157 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
-
Wischer v. Madison Realty Co.
146 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
225 , ; Lawrence v. Young, 144 La.
- Louisiana Canal Co. v. Leger 112 So. 2d 667 La. 1959
-
Daigle v. Pan American Production Co.
108 So. 2d 516
La. 1958
225 , ; Siegel v. Helis, 186 La.
- Lawton v. Anthony 92 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Russ v. Stephens
90 So. 2d 501
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
225 , ; Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co., 133 La.
-
Scheller v. Goode
69 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
225 , ; Siegel v. Helis, 186 La.
-
Green v. George
35 So. 2d 595
La. 1948
225 , ; Brashears et al. v. Chandler, La.App., 183 So.
-
International Paper Co. v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.
12 So. 2d 659
La. 1943
225 , ; Siegel v. Helis et al., 186 La.
-
Martel v. Hunt
197 So. 402
La. 1940
225 , , the acts of possession which the court considered sufficient were that Miller, after his purchase of the land, had the same surveyed and the boundary lines marked, and for a continuous period of seven years cut and used trees on the tract for building purposes; that he paid the taxes on the property continuously thr
-
Johnson v. Henderson
190 So. 171
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
225 , ; Bell v. Saunders, 139 La.
-
Board of Trustees of Ruston Circuit, Etc. v. Rudy
187 So. 549
La. 1939
225 , ; McConnell v. Ory, 46 La.Ann.
-
Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Burns
186 So. 85
La. 1939
225 , , and Haas v. Currie, 169 La.
-
Brashears v. Chandler
183 So. 546
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
225 , ; Bell v. Saunders, 139 La.
- Siegel v. Helis 172 So. 768 La. 1937
-
Segal v. Helis
168 So. 364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
225 , ; Gay v. Ellis, 33 La.Ann.
- Chestine Land Corp. v. Schuler 140 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. 139 So. 12 La. 1931
-
Zion's Rest Congregational Methodist Church v. Methodist Episcopal Church, South
137 So. 624
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
225 , ; Dalton V. Wickliffe, 35 La.
-
Amite Hardware Co. v. Pierce
8 La. App. 662
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
864 ; Boyd vs. Bradley, , 63 So.
-
Lemoine v. Dupuis
2 La. App. 726
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1925
They cite: Boyd vs. Bradley, , 63 South.
- Manning v. Shaw 98 So. 163 La. 1923