Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R., 64 So. 1012.

29 citing documents.

Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
652) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., So.
Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
652 ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., , 64 So.
Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
652 ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., [64] So.
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 511 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Cir.)] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., , 64 So.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
652 ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., , 62 So.
Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company 336 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
652 (La.App.Orl.Cir.)] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Hargroder v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. 290 So. 2d 874 La. 1974
652 ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
652 ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Georgia Pacific Corp. v. B.G.M. Builders 154 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
652 ] and LaCasse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Kelmell v. Atlas Life Insurance 107 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1958
Just such a situation was discussed by the Supreme Court in La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Clark v. Town of Mandeville 105 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
652 ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Richard v. National Surety Corporation 99 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
652 and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Wischer v. Madison Realty Company 92 So. 2d 589 La. 1956
652 ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Rapides Grocery Co. v. Vann 84 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Co. 82 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
652 ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co. 72 So. 2d 257 La. 1954
587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Ott & Prados v. New Orleans Coal & Bisso Towboat Co. 55 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
La Casse v. New Orleans T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Bartholomew v. Impastato 12 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
652 and La Casse v. N.O., T. M.R. Co., , 64 So.
Hand v. Coker 11 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
In the case of LaCasse v. New Orleans, T. M.R. Co., , 64 So.
Higginbotham v. Public Belt Railroad Commission 181 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employe to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employe, and, if none, then,’ etc., cover the same field as said Employers’ Liability Act, and are therefore superseded by it.” See, also, LaCasse v. N. O., T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Spiro v. Corliss 174 So. 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Ferguson v. Courtin 170 So. 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
750 ; La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. R. Co., , 64 So.
Crump v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 156 So. 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
The court, referring to the widow and minor children, said: “ * * * The federal statute confers that right upon the personal representative of the decedent, and not upon his widow and minor children.” See, also, La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Roy v. Mutual Rice Co. of Louisiana, Inc. 149 So. 508 La. 1933
Ann. 750 ; La Casse v. N. O., T. & M. R. R. Co., , 64 So.
McVay v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 148 So. 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
131 , , the court considered the effect of a suit brought by a widow, which suit, under the law, could be brought only by the personal representative of the deceased, that is to say, by the executor or administrator, and that in the Penny Case the court dismissed the suit, holding that the widow had no capacity to sta
Siren v. Montague 142 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
175 , the Supreme 'Court said: • “A total want-of legal right in a suitor, in relation to the matters in litigation, ought to be taken into consideration and acted on by courts of justice, at any stage of a cause.” In La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Charity Hospital v. Axford 131 So. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
234 ; La Casse v. N. O. T. & M. r’ Co., , 64 So.
Riley v. Cowgill 8 La. App. 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
948 ; Brown vs. Saul et al., 4 M. (N. S.) 434; La Casse vs. N. O. T. & M. R. Co., , 64 So.
Veasey v. Peters 77 So. 948 La. 1917
Ann. 750 ; La Casse v. N. O., T. & M. R. R. Co., , 64 South.