Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robertson, 63 So. 363.
- State v. Owens 301 So. 2d 591 La. 1974
- State v. Gilbert 286 So. 2d 345 La. 1973
- State v. Bueche 142 So. 2d 381 La. 1962
- State v. Leierer 140 So. 2d 375 La. 1962
- State v. Bickham 121 So. 2d 207 La. 1960
- State v. Eyer 110 So. 2d 521 La. 1959
-
State v. Matassa
62 So. 2d 609
La. 1952
15:447 and 15:448; , 63 So.
- State v. Rone 62 So. 2d 114 La. 1952
- State v. Bentley 54 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
- State v. Atwood 27 So. 2d 324 La. 1946
- State v. McKee 190 So. 325 La. 1939
- State v. Dallao 175 So. 4 La. 1937
- Overruled State v. Layton 158 So. 375 La. 1934
- State v. Baynham 158 So. 362 La. 1934
-
State v. Sharp
141 So. 859
La. 1932
809 , ; State v. Johnson, 149 La.
-
State v. McKee
128 So. 658
La. 1930
“A new trial cannot be obtained on the mere allegation that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence.” , 63 So.
-
State v. La Rocca
121 So. 744
La. 1929
mself, to have the assistance of counsel, and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” It is contended by the defendants that: “To deny an American citizen the right to have the testimony of witnesses, who can testify to his innocence, considered by the jury is to deny him due process of law, in violation of Section 2, Article 1 of the Constitution.” , S25, 63 So.
- State v. Glauson 115 So. 484 La. 1928
- State v. Scruggs 116 So. 206 La. 1928
- State v. Lofton 114 So. 109 La. 1927
- State v. Cole 109 So. 505 La. 1926
- State v. Ledoux 103 So. 177 La. 1925
- State v. Lewis 101 So. 386 La. 1924
- State v. Allen 101 So. 28 La. 1924
- State v. Alexander 99 So. 427 La. 1924