DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., 40 So. 2d 495.

15 citing documents.

  • PIGGLY-WIGGLY OP. WRHSE. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    Underwriters, , La.App., Orleans 1945; , La.App., 2d Cir.1946; , La.App., Orleans 1949; , La.App., 2d Cir.1953.
  • LeNormand v. Hardware Mutuals Insurance 163 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    unlawfully upon the roadway, their failure to have noted the situation will not be attributed to want of ordinary care in observing the way, unless the evidence shows the obstruction to have been such that the failure to have noted the situation shows the driver to have been carelessly or recklessly driving upon the highway.’ ” Our predecessors in Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., (writs refused), said: “It is also settled that there may be exceptional circumstances which will ser
  • Dyer v. Travelers Insurance Co. 159 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    See Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Guidroz v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Sizeler v. Southwestern Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Emmco Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Ellis v. Nola Cabs, Inc. 124 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 196 La.
  • Guidroz v. Travelers Insurance Co. 99 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    In Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., , we said: " * * * it sometimes happens that evidence tending to show contributory negligence seems to stand out predominantly, and in such cases it may be better to consider that evidence first because, if it appears that the true cause of the accident was the negligence or contributory negligence of the person
  • Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Cavalier 97 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    In Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., , in considering a case in which a second vehicle ran into the rear of one which was ahead, we discussed certain decisions of the Supreme Court and then said: “It is also settled that there may be exceptional circumstances which will serve to exculpate a driver * * And we believe that those exceptional circumstan
  • Albrecht v. Gaethe 97 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
    374.” Also note the following in Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., , 496: “ * * * it sometimes happens that evidence tending to show contributory-negligence seems to stand out predominantly, and in such cases it may be better to consider that evidence first because, if it appears that the true cause of the accident was the negligence or contributory negligence of the person injured o
  • Noland v. Liberty Mutual Ins. 89 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 196 La.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 86 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 196 La.
  • King v. Rabalais 79 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    It was his duty to’ have seen the trailer in time to avoid running into it and no valid reason in law is given, nor does any appear, why he did not timely see ‡ ‡ » *142 In Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., , the Court said: ; “In Hemel v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, supra, we said (La.App., ): ‘While in innumerable cases it has been held that regardless of the primary negligence of the person who has left the other vehicle or obstruction in the road, the failure
  • Sedotal v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 77 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1954
    Woodall v. Southern Scrap-Material Co., La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 196 La.
  • King v. Risdon & WE Holoman Lumber Company 76 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    Underwriters, La.App., 1945, ; Odom v. Long, La.App., 1946, ; Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Company, La.App., 1949, ; Dauzat v. Kelone, La.App., 1953, .
  • Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Barrosse 70 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    This situation is referred to in Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., , and which we, referring to a decision of the Supreme Court in Dodge v. Bituminous Casualty Company, 214 La.
  • Dauzat v. Kelone 65 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Co., La.App., ; Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co., La.App., ; Lynch v. Fisher, La.App., , should be invoked.
  • Buford v. Combs 50 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Company, La.App., ; Hemel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co., Inc., 196 La.