DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, 191 So. 148.

15 citing documents.

  • Malmay v. Sizemore 474 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    1 Cir., ; Boudreaux v. Cagle Motors, La.
  • Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1 Cir., ; Boudreaux v. Cagle Motors, La.App.
  • Gathe v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 345 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Smith v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 161 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Boudreaux v. Cagle Motors, La.App., .
  • Casano v. Cook 157 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    980 , ; Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Parks v. Hall, 189 La.
  • Haspel v. Treece 150 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    App. 1 Cir., ; Boudreaux v. Cagle Motors, La.App.
  • Anderson v. Adams 148 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., , it was held that a truck belonging to a police jury of a particular parish and entrusted to the general care of a parish employee, Thomas Thibodeaux, and being driven by Thibodeaux's son, Russell, with the father's consent, was being operated with the permission of the named insured.
  • Musmeci v. American Automobile Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    222 ; Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Edwards v. Royal Indemnity Co., 182 La.
  • Coco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 136 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    1 Cir., ; Boudreaux v. Cagle Motors, La.
  • Rogillio v. Cazedessus 127 So. 2d 734 La. 1961
    Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Donovan v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, La.
  • Garland v. Audubon Insurance Company 119 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    320 and Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., , which he contends are controlling here.
  • Longwell v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. 63 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    320 and Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., , which he contends are controlling here.
  • Boyd v. American Fire & Casualty Co. 50 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 193 La.
  • Dominguez v. American Casualty Co. 46 So. 2d 744 La. 1950
    191 ; Perrodin v. Thibodeaux, La.App., ; Farnet v. De Cuers, La.App., 195 So.
  • Clemons v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. 18 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    In the case of Perrodin v. Thibodeaux [La.App.], [151], the named assured in the insurance policy was the Police Jury, and the Omnibus Clause recited among other things that the operation of the truck must be with the permission of the named assured, in order to hold the insurance company liable.