Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Young v. Thompson, 189 So. 487.

14 citing documents.

Rapides Savings & L. Ass'n v. Lakeview Develop. Corp. 326 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1971); (La.App.
Whitten v. Travelers Insurance Company 141 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Radalec, Inc. 126 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
1st Cir., 1939, ; Walker v. National Life & Accident Ins.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Morehouse Realty Co. 126 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Tenner v. Griffin 53 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
421 ; Young v. Thompson, La.App., ; Wren v. Brock, La.App., 200 So.
Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York 41 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., , citing Jackson v. Cook, 189 La.
Lacour v. Texas P. Ry. Co. 32 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Young v. Creegan 23 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
App., ; Eggleston v. Louisiana A.R.Co., La.
Morales v. Burns 21 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
App., ; Stinseri v. Cassagne, 191 La.
Carroll v. Louisiana Iron Supply Co. 17 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
321 ; Young v. Thompson, La.App., ; Eggleston v. Louisiana A.R.
Barnes v. Texas New Orleans R. Co. 16 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
774 , and the doctrine is also discussed by our brethren of the First Circuit in the case of Young v. Thompson, La.App., , and of the Orleans Court in Fontenot v. Freudenstein et al., La.App., 199 So.
Brown v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co. 14 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
195 ; Young v. Thompson, La.App., .
Domite v. Thompson 9 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
In that case defendant's counsel relied upon the case of Young v. Thompson, La.App., , which held that such a motion was permissible; and in view of the defendant's reliance on this decision, we held that he should be allowed to normally rest his side of the case after or without adducing evidence.
Williams v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 6 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
They cite and principally rely upon Young v. Thompson, La.App., , decided by our brethren of the First Circuit, with Judge Dore dissenting in part, as precedent for their action.