No. 1989
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Pike, Lapeyre & Brother v. Judge of the Fourth District Court
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., December 6, 1965 180 So. 2d 750
State ex rel. Pike, Lapeyre & Brother v. Judge of the Fourth District Court, 21 La. Ann. 125 (1869).
Opinion text
Howe, J. The facts of this case are substantially the same as those in the case of State, ex. rel. D’Meza and others v. Judge of the Fourth District' Court 5 and, as in that case, we perceive no legal necessity for the writ which is asked for. For the reasons given in the case of D’Meza, It is* ordered that the rule taken by relators herein be dismissed with costs..