DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCartan v. Filkins, 64 So. 717.

17 citing documents.

  • Larocca v. Larocca 606 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Larocca v. Larocca 597 So. 2d 1000 La. 1992
  • Billiot v. Rivere 378 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Moreover, in regard to the testimony of private detectives, , 64 So.
  • Nickens v. Nickens 303 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Bynum v. Bynum 296 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • Udin v. Levin 273 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    In other words, the circumstantial proof in these cases must be so convincing as to exclude any other reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt.” In weighing the evidence in this case to determine whether it meets the foregoing stringent test which was imposed upon the trial judge and is now imposed upon this Court, , 64 So.
  • Odom v. Odom 270 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    There it was stated: “It is urged by counsel for defendant that the testimony of private detectives, while admissible, must be corroborated, , 64 So.
  • Patrick v. Patrick 212 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
  • Poole v. Poole 189 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Portman v. Portman 181 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    It is urged by counsel for defendant that the testimony of private detectives, *431 while admissible, must be corroborated, , 64 So.
  • Harris v. Harris 81 So. 2d 705 La. 1955
    plaintiff invoke the doctrine applied;' in numerous cases that “ * * * In '-actions for divorce, courts must take such 'evidence as the nature of the case permits, Sircumstantial, direct, or positive, and bring to bear upon it the experiences and observations of life, and thus weighing it with prudence and care give effect to its just preponderance.” , 64 So.
  • Savin v. Savin 51 So. 2d 41 La. 1951
    ve, and in doing so took full advantage of his legal right to attack the behavior and character of his wife.” In this court counsel for plaintiff maintains that circumstantial or indirect evidence or the alleged act of adultery, which he concedes is principally contained in the record of this case, can support a judgment of absolute divorce; and, as a basis therefor, , 64 So.
  • Guidry v. Allemand 43 So. 2d 611 La. 1949
    On this point our settled jurisprudence is as follows : ' “ * * * In actions for divorce, courts must take such evidence as the nature of the case permits, circumstantial, direct, or positive, and bring to bear upon it the experiences and observations of life, and thus weighing it with prudence and care give effect to its just preponderance.” , 64 So.
  • Coston v. Coston 200 So. 474 La. 1941
  • Gauthier v. Matthews 185 So. 272 La. 1938
    “In actions for divorce, courts must take such evidence as the nature of the case permits, circumstantial, direct, or positive, and bring to bear upon it the experiences and observations of life, and thus weighing it with prudence and care give effect to its just preponderance.” , 64 So.
  • Tasker v. White 128 So. 523 La. 1930
  • Mender v. Brauch 75 So. 1000 La. 1917