Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 762 So. 2d 1107.

29 citing documents.

  • Crystal Bell o/b/o D'Arbri Cox v. Big Star of Tallulah, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
    5/26/00), Lawrence v. City of Shreveport, 41,825 (La.
  • Judith Prince Versus Rouse's Enterprises, L.L.C. D/B/A Rouses Markets La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
    5/26/00), the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s determination that a hole, of indeterminate size, in the crosswalk constituted an unreasonable risk of harm.7 While the plaintiff estimated the hole as three to four inches deep and her daughter estimated the hole as three to six inches deep, the defendant's maintena
  • Waddles v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 181 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    He contends that the trial court should have considered Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), , writ denied, 0.0-0938 (La.5/26/00), , in which the court stated that a heightened* standard of care applied when the defect in question was located in the crosswalk of a parking lot where customers were expected to walk.
  • Kristy Bailey v. David R. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 3/1/00), writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), the plaintiff slipped and fell in a store.
  • Bailey v. Leblanc 151 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), , the plaintiff slipped and fell in a store.
  • Beckham v. Jungle Gym, L.L.C. 37 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), , writ denied, 00-0938 (La.5/26/00), .
  • Margie F. Martin v. Safeway Insurance co.of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 5/26/00), slipped and fell while shopping in the defendant’s store.
  • Dillon v. LA MADELEINE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Dana Patin v. Evangeline Downs of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Patin v. Evangeline Downs of Louisiana, Inc. 3 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00), , writ *640 denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), .
  • Moore v. Oak Meadows Apartments 997 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 32,770 (La.App.2 Cir. 03/01/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/26/00), .
  • Raymond Cole v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 5/26/00), the plaintiff suffered from shoulder, lower back, and leg pain as a result of a slip and fall accident.
  • Cole v. Allstate Ins. Co. 987 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 5/26/00) , , the plaintiff suffered from shoulder, lower back, and leg pain as a result of a slip and fall accident.
  • Bennett v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 983 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    App. 3d Cir.3/1/00) , writ denied, 00-0929 (La.5/26/00), (award of $22,000 general damages for ten-month back injury with residual pain caused by aggravation of pre-existing arthritis); Fowler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 30,843 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/98), (award of $25,000 general damages for fourteen-month back strain which *975 caused aggravation of pre-existing
  • Lester Blackman v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Blackman v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 966 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), .
  • Roberts v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 3/1/00), , writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), .
  • Albert L. Roberts, Jr., Et Ux. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/00), writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00)
  • Billye S. Cohen, Et Vir v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Cohen v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. 887 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00), .
  • Sanders v. Backus True Value Hardware, Inc. 877 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Appellants also submit Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Inc., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), , writ denied, 2000-0938 (La.5/26/00), , in support of its argument.
  • Johnson v. City of Monroe 870 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.03/01/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/26/00), .
  • McAdams v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 862 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    App.2d Cir.03/01/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/26/00), : The determination that a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm predominantly encompasses an abundance of factual findings, which differ greatly from case to case.
  • Lofton v. Hayward 806 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied, 2000-0938 (La.5/26/00)
  • Leaman v. Continental Cas. Co. 798 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/26/00), , a seventy-two year old plaintiff filed suit against a local grocery store after she stepped in a sunken portion of a crosswalk located directly in front of the store's entrance.
  • Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments 793 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In Kendall v. Weingarten Realty Management Co., 33,903 (La.App.2d Cir.9/27/00), , citing Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Inc., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.3/1/00), , writ denied, 00-0938 (La.5/26/00), , this court stated: The determination that a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm predominantly encompasses an abundance of factual findings, which differ greatly from case to case.
  • Smith v. New Orleans Police Dept. 784 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 3/1/00) , , writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.5/26/00), .
  • Terry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 780 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 3/1/00) ; , writ denied, 00-929 (La.5/26/00); .
  • Kendall v. WEINGARTEN REALTY MGMT. CO. 769 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 32,770 (La.App.2d Cir.03/01/00), , *174 writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/26/00), , a case with somewhat similar facts to that at hand, this court recently applied this same analysis.