Hopewell, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co.
Also decided on this docket: La., March 30, 2001 788 So. 2d 438; La., February 9, 2001 784 So. 2d 653
Hopewell, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co., 784 So. 2d 653 (La. 2001).
Cited by
Distinguished in 3
- Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation 79 So. 3d 246 La. 2011
- Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp. 47 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
- LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 981 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Lejeune Brothers, Inc. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company 329 So. 2d 744
Opinion text
In re: Hopewell Inc.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Red River, 39th Judicial District Court Div. O, No. 30,820; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 33,-774-CW. Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. Judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s exception of no right of action is reinstated. Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, 329 So.2d 744 (La.1975) (on rehearing), which the Court of Appeal relied upon, involves rights arising under a lease and is distinguishable from the instant facts. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket. VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ.