DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Powell v. State, 774 So. 2d 151.

29 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Patrick Plaisance La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    11/17/00), aff’d, 00-1246 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Tyree La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    11/17/00), aff’d, 00-1246 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Carey Agregaard, IV La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    11/17/00), aff’d, 00-1246 (La.
  • Scott Joseph Fin v. Remy Baus Fin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    11/ 13/ 00), in determining whether there is a material change in circumstances "[ i] t is the child upon whom we must focus.
  • Guidry v. Guidry 274 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Harrel v. Harrel 251 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    11/13/00), , Justice Weimer, then serving on the First Circuit, observed that "[l]ife changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified."
  • Freeman v. Johnson 225 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    11/13/00), , the First Circuit Court of’Appeal found that the father proved a material change in circumstances materially affecting his daughter’s welfare “by showing that she had reached, school age, that the existing custody/visitation schedule was thereby made unworkable and that her relationship with her brother would be aff
  • Boesch v. Boesch 210 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Tinsley v. Tinsley 211 So. 3d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    11/13/00), , this court, citing Evans, 708 So.2d at 738 , specifically noted that the first prong of this test to determine whether custody should be modified is sometimes referred to as “a material change in circumstances,” and other times is expressed as “a change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child.
  • Rozetta Mizell v. Juston Stone La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    11/13/00), “[l]ife changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified.” Rozetta Mizell’s marriage to Roy Mancil The record does establish that Mr. Mancil has a felony criminal record dating back to 2003, and that he served a prison sentence f
  • Theriot v. Theriot 177 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Joseph Albert Tarver v. Melissa Waddell Tarver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    11/13/00), wherein he stated: ―‗Life changes may occur, but if the 6 changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified.‘‖ The only life change that has occurred since the stipulated judgment is the birth of Andrea‘s and Joseph‘s new
  • Hebert v. Schexnayder 113 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1 Cir. 9/18/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere 69 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    1st Cir.9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Bonnecarrere v. Bonnecarrere 37 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1st Cir.9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Harang v. Ponder 36 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 6 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , 356-357 n. 2, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Falcon v. Falcon 992 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Hobbs v. Hobbs 962 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 09/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Pinegar v. Harris 961 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , -357 , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Garret Linn Leblanc v. Nichole Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    11/13/00), “[l]ife changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified.” In that same case, Judge Pro Tem Fontenot, in his dissenting opinion, also noted: While visitation may be judicially modified to accommodate the needs of a growing c
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 951 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), , "[l]ife changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified."
  • Cedotal v. Cedotal 927 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 9/13/00) , , 356-357 n. 2, writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Sanders v. Sanders 923 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Wages v. Wages 899 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Pender v. Pender 890 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 2000-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • D'Aquilla v. D'Aquilla 879 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • White v. Kimrey 847 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    1st Cir.09/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), .
  • Montalvo v. Montalvo 854 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 9/13/00), , writ denied, 00-2838 (La.11/13/00), , Justice Weimer, then serving on the first circuit, recognized: “Life changes may occur, but if the changes do not have an effect on the welfare of the child, then no change in custody is justified.” Since the entry of the consent judgment, both parties have experienced life changes.