Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morris, 799 So. 2d 462.

16 citing documents.

Don Caldwell, Individually and Sheronda Caldwell, Individually v. St. Charles Gaming Company D/B/A Isle of Capri Casino-Lake Charles La. 2020
10/16/01), (This court found Richard was not a seaman as his duties were not substantially related to his employer’s vessels in navigation.).
Ernest Guidry, Et Ux v. Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Guidry v. ABC Insurance Co. 206 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lewis v. Young 187 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2172 , 132 L.Ed.2d 314 (1995); Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 01-0145, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), ; see also 46 U.S.C.
Marshall Troglen v. Hydraulic Well Control La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/16/01), - 66 (alterations in original).
Troglen v. Hydraulic Well Control 149 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 01-145, pp. 3-5 (La.10/16/01), -66 (alterations in original).
Navarre v. KOSTMAYER CONST. CO., INC. 52 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 2001-0145, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), (citing Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 368 , 115 S.Ct.
Dione Cagle v. Harrah's Lake charles/players Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/4/00), reversed on other grounds, 01-145 (La.10/16/01)
Cagle v. Harrah's Lake Charles, LLC 974 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/4/00) , , reversed on other grounds, 01-145 (La.10/16/01), .
Ovie Reeves, Jr. v. F. Miller & Sons, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
10/16/01), -67, addressed the issue of who qualifies as a seaman under the Jones Act: The United States Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347, 115 S.Ct.
Reeves v. F. Miller & Sons, Inc. 967 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 01-145 (La.10/16/01), , 465-67, addressed the issue of who qualifies as a seaman under the Jones Act: The United States Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347 , 115 S.Ct.
Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc. 964 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Richard v. Hooks, 01-0145, p. 4 (La.10/16/01), .
Bell v. Dunn 924 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
10/16/01), , in support of its argument that the 30% standard, referred to in Chandris and recognized by the jurisprudence in general, is not, in and of itself, sufficient to establish seaman's status.
Hayles v. Sonat Exploration Co. 868 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
at 2191 ; see also Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/16/01), .
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See, e.g., Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 01-0145 (La.10/16/01), , 464, cert.
Buford v. Cardinal Services, Inc. 801 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Richard v. Mike Hooks, Inc., 2001-0145 (La.10/16/01); .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by