State ex rel. Woodcock v. State
State ex rel. Woodcock v. State, 772 So. 2d 112 (La. 2000).
Cited by
- Fleniken v. Entergy Corp. 780 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Deloch v. Whitley 684 So. 2d 349
- State Ex Rel. Bernard v. CRIM. DIST. COURT SECTION" J" 653 So. 2d 1174
Opinion text
In re State of Louisiana; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District *113 Court Div. I, No. 275-617; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-0158. Writ granted. Because relator cannot prevail on his merits claims, see, e.g., Deloche v. Whitley, 96-1901, p. 1 (La.11/22/96), 684 So.2d 349 , and because the district attorney is not the custodian of the requested documents, R.S. 44:31 (A)(3), the district court’s ruling denying the state’s motion to quash Woodcock’s subpoena duces tecum is reversed. Cf. State ex rel. Bernard v. Cr.D.C., 94-2247, p. 1 (La.4/28/95), 653 So.2d 1174, 1175 (custodian need only supply documents free of charge if application “requir[es] the requested documentation for support.”). JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ.