Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Dudley, 760 So. 2d 309.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Derrick Cardet Withers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Marlin Devary Demouchet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Clements 112 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), ; State v. Norwood, 01-0432 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/31/00), however, the supreme court found that vacation of the habitual offender sentence was not necessary where the transcript failed to reflect the trial court vacated the previously imposed sentence before imposing the habitual offender sentence.
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , however, the supreme court found that vacation of the habitual offender sentence was not necessary where the transcript failed to reflect the trial court vacated the previously imposed sentence before imposing the habitual offender sentence.
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, 1999-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Demond Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), (per curiam).
State v. Collins 44 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found vacating a habitual offender sentence was not necessary when the transcript failed to reflect that the trial court vacated the previously imposed sentence before imposing a habitual offender sentence.
State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See, State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State v. Evans 30 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Mayer, 99-8124 (La.3/31/00), , our supreme court found that to the extent that the commitment/minute entry reflected that the trial judge had vacated the defendant’s original sentence “and thereby eliminated any possible confusion as to the terms of the defendant’s confinement, the failure of the transcript of the multiple offender hearing t
State v. McMillan 30 So. 3d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , this Court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, 1999-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 9/28/99) , , writ granted in part on other grounds, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 9/28/99) , , writ granted in part on other grounds, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), .
Distinguished State v. Young 996 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
This case is distinguishable from State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , where the transcript did not show the trial court had vacated the defendant's original sentence before imposing the habitual offender sentence, but the commitment and minute entry did reflect that the original sentence was vacated.
State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
art. 921; Compare, State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), (per curiam) (To the extent that the commitment/minute entry reflects that the trial judge vacated the defendant's original sentence and thereby eliminated any possible confusion as to the terms of the defendant's confinement, the failure of the transcript of the multiple offender hearing to show that the court d
State v. Pitre 893 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , however, the supreme court found that vacation of the habitual offender sentence was not necessary where the transcript failed to reflect the trial court vacated the previously imposed sentence before imposing the habitual offender sentence.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3/31/00), however, the supreme court found that vacation of the habitual offender sentence was not necessary where the transcript failed to reflect the trial court vacated the previously imposed sentence before imposing the habitual offender sentence.
State v. Johnson 864 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , reh'g denied, 99-3124 (La.5/12/00), .
State v. Bright 860 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
However, in, State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , reh'g denied, 99-3124 (La.5/12/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that an enhanced sentence in such circumstances was valid: To the extent that the ...
State v. Boss 848 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 7/30/01) , , in which this court followed the dictates of State v. Mayer, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/31/00), , and deviated from its long held practice of vacating the multiple offender sentence as null and void and remanding the case to the district court for the purpose of vacating the original sentence and resentencing defendant as a multiple offender.
State v. Triche 848 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
However, in State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court found that an enhanced sentence in such circumstances was valid: To the extent that the ...
State v. Simmons 839 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
3/31/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that an enhanced sentence in such circumstances was valid: To the extent that the ...
State v. Wilson 839 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 8/29/01), -725 , interpreting State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , 816 and citing State v. Jackson , XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
State v. Robinson 818 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue in State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , reversing the Fifth Circuit when it took similar action.
State v. Norwood 802 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
However, in State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit when it took a similar action.
State v. Davis 792 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 9/28/99) , writ granted in part, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , this court ruled that an enhanced sentence was null and void because the original sentence had not been vacated.
State v. Cushinello 792 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
App.3/31/00), , the court found that an enhanced sentence in such circumstances was a valid sentence: To the extent that the ...
State v. Jackson 814 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
5th Cir.9/28/99), , writ granted in part, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), , the fifth circuit declared a habitual offender sentence to be null and void because the original sentence had not been vacated.