Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bilbe, 772 So. 2d 87.

46 citing documents.

  • In re Armato 958 So. 2d 650 La. 2007
    Turning to the issue of an appropriate sanction, the committee noted that this court has imposed one year and one day suspensions for misconduct similar to respondent’s. See, e.g., In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Powers, 98-2826 (La.1/29/99), ; and In re: Kendrick, 98-0623 (La.4/3/98), .
  • In Re Riehlmann 891 So. 2d 1239 La. 2005
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Zohdy 892 So. 2d 1277 La. 2005
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Brown 892 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
    ating factors); In re: Smith, 00-2627 (La.11/27/00), (one year and one day suspension imposed for failure to communicate with two clients, neglect of the clients’ legal matters, failure to account for or refund unearned fees and advanced costs, and failure to cooperate with the ODC; numerous aggravating factors present but no mitigating factors); In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), (one year and one day suspension imposed upon an attorney who failed to communicate with a client and abandoned
  • In Re Bordelon 894 So. 2d 315 La. 2005
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In Re Comish 889 So. 2d 236 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Levith 884 So. 2d 1197 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re Lawrence 884 So. 2d 561 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Laiche 885 So. 2d 524 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re LeBlanc 884 So. 2d 552 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In Re Hoffman 883 So. 2d 425 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In Re Stamps 874 So. 2d 113 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In re Lacobee 866 So. 2d 237 La. 2004
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), 760.
  • In re Small 863 So. 2d 500 La. 2003
    See In re: Dooley, 02-2152 (La.2/14/03), 841So.2d 745 (one-year and one day suspension imposed stemming from neglect of a legal matter, failure to communicate with a client upon abandonment of law practice, as well as failure to cooperate with the ODC); In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), (one-year and one day suspension imposed stemming from neglect of a legal matter, failure to communicate with the client, failure to account for his fee, failure to take any efforts to resolve a fee dispute
  • In Re Sledge 859 So. 2d 671 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In re Kelly 857 So. 2d 451 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: *458 Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In Re Jones 859 So. 2d 666 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Tousant 851 So. 2d 1048 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In Re Warner 851 So. 2d 1029 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Crawford 843 So. 2d 1091 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In Re Blair 840 So. 2d 1191 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In Re Grevemberg 838 So. 2d 1283 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In re Graham 841 So. 2d 707 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Goff 837 So. 2d 1201 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Cohen 840 So. 2d 484 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re White 840 So. 2d 488 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Bonnette 840 So. 2d 512 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Laurent 835 So. 2d 430 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In re Donnan 838 So. 2d 715 La. 2003
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re Hackman 833 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892, p. 4 (La.10/27/00), , 89; In re: Lain, 00-0148, p. 7 (La.5/26/00), , 1156; (La.
  • In re Dunn 831 So. 2d 889 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Mathews 827 So. 2d 1129 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Richard 826 So. 2d 542 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Smith 821 So. 2d 1286 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re Bolton 820 So. 2d 548 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Dumas 819 So. 2d 313 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re Marinoff 819 So. 2d 305 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Henderson 819 So. 2d 296 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In re Dumaine 818 So. 2d 756 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Levy
  • In Re Faucheux 818 So. 2d 734 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Robinson 819 So. 2d 280 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00), .
  • In Re Barstow 817 So. 2d 1123 La. 2002
    In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Lain, 00-0148 (La.5/26/00)
  • In re Taylor 802 So. 2d 1287 La. 2002
    The board cited In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), (one year and one day suspension for an attorney who abandoned his law practice, neglected legal matters, failed to communicate with clients, failed to account for or return unearned legal fees, and failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation); In re: Bivins, 98-2513 (La.12/11/98), (one year an
  • In re Vaughan 801 So. 2d 1058 La. 2001
    In re Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), (hereinafter referred to as Vaughan I).
  • In re Bankston 791 So. 2d 1263 La. 2001
    See In re: Vaughan, 00-1892 (La.10/27/00), ; In re: Powers, 98-2826 (La.1/29/99), ; In re: Kendrick, 98-0623 (La.4/3/98), .
  • Doe v. LA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS 788 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In In re Vaughan, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/27/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a determination of the appropriate sanction, we are mindful that the purpose of lawyer disciplinary proceedings is not primarily to punish the lawyer, but rather to maintain appropriate standards of professional conduct to safeguard the public, to preserve the integrity