Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Hearin, 786 So. 2d 682.

159 citing documents.

  • Tunstall v. Stierwald 809 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
    Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Darbone v. State 815 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Lasyone v. Kansas City S. R.R., 00-2628, p. 8 (La.4/3/01); .
  • Schreiber v. JEWISH FEDERATION 839 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 2000-2628, p. 9, (La.4/3/01), .
  • Hebert v. Old Republic Ins. Co. 807 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    City S. R.R., 00-2628, at 5-6 (La.4/3/01), ; Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Transportation and Development, .
  • Hagood v. Brakefield 805 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R., 00-2628 (La.4/3/01), at fn.
  • Moreau v. NORTH AMERICAN FIRE AND CAS. INSURANCE COMPANY 806 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, State of Louisiana Through DOTD and the Parish of Pointe Coupee Through its Governing Authoroity, the Police Jury of Pointe Coupee Parish, 00-2628, at 5-6 (La.4/3/01), , 688; Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Transportation and Development, (La.
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Standard of Review In Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 00-2628, pp. 5-6 (La.4/3/01); -689 , the supreme court reviewed the standard of review applicable to findings of fact: A trial court's finding of fact may not be reversed absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
  • Hicks v. State 802 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 2000-2628 (La.4/3/01), , citing Stobart v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Transportation and Development, 92-1328 (La.4/12/93), .
  • Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad 809 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern Railroad, 2000-2628, p. 23 (La.4/3/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed our earlier decision, reinstated the trial court's judgment, and remanded the matter to us for appellate review of the damages awarded to Mr. Lasyone by the trial court.