No. 2002 CA 0603
Precedential
Processed
Wright v. Waguespack
Wright v. Waguespack, 836 So. 2d 436 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002).
Cited by
- Martha Lepree v. Christopher Dorsey and Cheryl Fields La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Bruzeau v. Wells Fargo, Bank, N.A. 99 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Clower v. Bank of America 5 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Opinion text
| FITZSIMMONS, Judge, concurring with reasons. The issue of due diligence required of a curator has historically been a fact-driven issue. In this case, it is not disputed that the curator made several attempts to reach the debtor. The means used involved certified letters to various addresses that were provided to her. Irrespective of the correctness of the addresses, it is a fact that the debtor had actual notice. While I concur with the finding of the majority, I am concerned by the delay that occurred between appointment of the curator and the attempted notification of the pending sale.