No. 2002 KJ 1867
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. L.A.H.
State ex rel. L.A.H., 836 So. 2d 447 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002).
Cited by
- State ex rel. J.C. 134 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State ex rel. J.S.A. 119 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State ex rel. M.A.A. 897 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Opinion text
hPETTIGREW, J., concurring. I respectfully concur because the majority opinion reflects the current law of the First Circuit Court of Appeal. However, I am of the humble opinion that Juvenile Code Arts. 905, 909, 910, 911, and 912 provide authority to the juvenile court judge to modify dispositions to insure and review the conditions, supervisions, treatments, and rehabilitation programs for the children in a broader manner than which is presently defined by the First Circuit Court of Appeal. Nevertheless, since the majority’s opinion does reflect the current law of the First Circuit Court of Appeal, I am compelled to follow it.