DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tapps, 841 So. 2d 789.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus John B. Gustave, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State of Louisiana Versus Terez Ard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State v. Shelby 263 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. David Ray Newsom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    4/21/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress and stated: Unless the trial court’s conclusions are not supported by the evidence or there exists a clear abuse of discretion, an appellate court should not overturn the trial court’s ruling.
  • State v. Newsom 250 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/21/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress and stated: Unless the trial court's conclusions are not supported by the evidence or there exists a clear abuse of discretion, an appellate court should not overturn the trial court's ruling.
  • State v. Carter 171 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Humbles 169 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Gros 138 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    App. 5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Bryant 110 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Granger 103 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , where this Court held that the victim’s testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JAMES WILLIE WHITE AKA JAMES WILLIE WHITE, JR. AKA JAMES JUNE WHITE, ETC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 10/30/02), writ denied, 02-2920 (La.4/21/03)
  • State v. White 87 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 10/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2920 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Napolean 87 So. 3d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), ; State v. Brown, 04-1194 (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 83 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , where this Court held that the victim’s testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Vargas 66 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), ; (citing State v. Williams, 00-1725, pp. 14-15 (La.11/28/01), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Morgan 34 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , in an error patent review, this Court noted that the trial judge failed to restrict at least two years of defendant’s sentence for forcible rape from benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence, as required by LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Smith 20 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , unit denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Starr 2 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Gaddis 973 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Eugene Dunn, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4/21/03), (citations omitted), this court stated: When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, the appellate court looks at the totality of the evidence presented at the suppression hearing.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 10/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2920 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Williams 926 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , where this Court held that the victim's testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Polizzi 924 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5th Cir.10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , where this Court held that the juvenile victim's testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 10/30/02) , , writ denied, 02-2920 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Singleton 922 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , this court held that the juvenile victim's testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence presented by the state, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Patterson 922 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir.10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , this Court held that the juvenile victim's testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Turner 904 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , this Court held that the juvenile victim's testimony alone, even absent any additional physical evidence, was sufficient to establish the elements of the offense of forcible rape.
  • State v. Ward 903 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Lai 902 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 10/29/02) , , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Danny Ray Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    4/21/03), this court discussed the standard of review utilized by the appellate court in this situation: When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, the appellate court looks at the totality of the evidence presented at the suppression hearing.
  • State v. Sherman 896 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 10/30/02), -40 , writ denied, 02-2920 (La.4/21/03), , this court discussed the standard of review utilized by the appellate court in this situation: When reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress, the appellate court looks at the totality of the evidence presented at the suppression hearing.
  • State v. Thompkins 896 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), (forcible rape of a juvenile); State v. Dickerson, 01-1287 (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 888 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), ; State v. Hotoph, 99-243, p. 17 (La.App.
  • State v. Crockett 886 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    5th Cir.10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Peden 875 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .
  • State v. Walker 865 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), , wherein we said: In State v. Celestine, 98-1166, p. 9 (La.App.
  • State v. Enclard 850 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 10/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2921 (La.4/21/03), .