State ex rel. Payne v. State
State ex rel. Payne v. State, 828 So. 2d 1113 (La. 2002).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Hayes 423 So. 2d 1111
- State v. Tanner 425 So. 2d 760
- State v. Hingle 242 La. 844
- State v. Louis 645 So. 2d 1144
Opinion text
In re Payne, Kevin; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. 99-175; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No(s). 01-KH-1294, 01-KH-1215. Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded. The district court is directed to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will determine if the district attorney representing the state misinformed relator that relator faced no further charges in Jefferson Parish, and if so, whether this misinformation induced relator to plead guilty. See Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 , 92 S.Ct. 495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); State v. Hayes, 423 So.2d 1111 (La.1982). If the Court finds that the misinformation induced the plea, it must determine whether to allow relator to withdraw his guilty plea or to order the further charges dismissed. State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760, 763 (La.1983); State v. Hingle, 242 La. 844 , 139 So.2d 205, 210 (1961); see also State v. Louis, 94-0761, p. 10-14 (La.11/30/94), 645 So.2d 1144, 1149-51 . In all other respects the application is denied. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ.