State ex rel. Russell v. State
State ex rel. Russell v. State, 822 So. 2d 599 (La. 2002).
Cited by
- Adam Bordelon, Et Ux. v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- A & B Valve and Piping Systems, LLC v. Commercial Metals Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- A & B Valve & Piping Systems, L.L.C. v. Commercial Metals Co. 28 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Opinion text
In re Russell, Preston;—Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. A, No. 288-716; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2001-K-2324. Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he filed on or about December 6, 2001. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is *600 ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.