Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Williams v. State, 839 So. 2d 26.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Nancy Rogers A/K/A Nancy Lynn Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir. 1/15/02), writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), this Court addressed the merits of a claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness despite the defendant’s failure to raise the issue at the trial court level.
State of Louisiana Versus Jared Diaz La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Cory Bartholomew La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
3/14/03), State v. Williams, 99-2576 (La.
State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 1/15/02), -71 , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), (Three counts of first degree robbery sentenced consecutively were not excessive, even though the acts at issue were “clearly part of the same course of conduct.”) Therefore, the instant case has an adequate factual basis for the imposition of consecutive sentences.
State v. Pierre 131 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Marshall 128 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-481 (La.3/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3/14/03), where the court, in dicta, may have been suggesting this issue may be raised in a motion to reconsider sentence.
State v. Leger 92 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-481 (La.3/14/03), , where the court, in dicta, may have been suggesting this issue may be raised in a motion to reconsider sentence.
State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , unit denied, 02-481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Harris 66 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/15/02), , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Evans 30 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 1/15/02), , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Lee 15 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 2002-0481 (La.3/14/03), , addressed questions of vindictiveness in sentencing, despite the defendant’s failure to raise the issue before the trial court.
State v. Jones 998 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Darensbourg 948 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), , this Court addressed the merits of a claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness despite the defendant's failure to raise the issue at the trial court level.
State v. Jackson 926 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 1/15/02) , , writ denied, 02-0481 (La.3/14/03), .
State v. Blanchard 861 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
App. 5 Cir. 1/15/02), , writ denied, 02-481 (La.3/14/03), .