No. 2002-KK-2747 Precedential Processed

State v. Hart

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed November 12, 2002 · 829 So. 2d 410

Cited by

Derek Coutee v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
John Thibodeaux v. Gulfgate Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Thibodeaux v. Gulfgate Constr., LLC 270 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State in the Interest of C.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State ex rel. C.D. 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State Ex Rel. Cd 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Henry v. Williams 892 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 871 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lawrence Hagler Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Conrad v. City of New Iberia 847 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003

Opinion text

In re Hart, Burnell Sr.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. I, No. 427-717; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-K-2225. Writ granted. On the present record, we are unable to determine whether the trial court acted with knowledge of the witness’ restored competence. Therefore, this matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the motion for continuance in light of the apparently recently discovered evidence of the witness’ restored competence. KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., would deny the writ.