Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 867 So. 2d 686.

65 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
2/13/04), the Third Circuit upheld the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that “he might—he felt like he should talk to an attorney.” The Third Circuit concluded that “[t]he defendant’s statement
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Mitchell, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jordan D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
2/13/04), : While observing that La.
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2/ 13/ 04), the court found that the defendant' s statement regarding his " thinking" that he possibly " should" speak with an attorney is not the type of unequivocal and unambiguous statement described above.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/13/04), this court stated in considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence: [A] reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational trier of fact could have concluded that the essential elements of the offense wer
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/13/04), , this court stated in considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence: [A] reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational trier of fact could have concluded that the essential elements of the offense were proven beyond a reasona
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Anderson -Aka- Samuel Brent Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2/13/04), the Third Circuit upheld the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that “he might–he felt like he should talk to an attorney.” The Third Circuit concluded that “[t]he
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/13/04), , the Third Circuit upheld the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that "he might-he felt like he should talk to an attorney."
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 10/1/03), -175, writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), the Third Circuit upheld the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that “he might--he felt like he should talk to an attorney.” The Third Circuit concluded that “[t]he defendant’s statement
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/13/04), , the Third Circuit upheld the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that “he might—he felt like he should talk to an attorney.” The Third Circuit concluded that “[t]he defendant’s statement regarding his ‘thinking1 tha
State of Louisiana v. Joenell Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2/13/04), ), this court has explained the insufficiency analysis as follows: In considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational
State v. Rubin 211 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/13/04), ), this court has explained the insufficiency analysis as follows: In considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational trier of fact could have concluded that the essential element
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. AKA William Chester Farry AKA William C. Farry AKA William … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/1/03), writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04)
State v. Farry 206 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/13/04), ), this court has explained the insufficiency analysis as follows: In considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational tr
State v. Smith 204 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/13/04), ), this court has explained the insufficiency analysis as follows: In considering questions of sufficiency of the evidence, a reviewing court must consider the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution and consider whether a rational trier of fact could have concluded that the essential element
State of Louisiana v. Adam Batiste, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Batiste 189 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RAY DELOACH AKA RAY A. DELOACH La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. David Caleb Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Fontenot 160 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Willie James Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/1/03), writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04)
State v. Robertson 135 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ de nied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/1/03), writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04)
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Sparkman 136 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), ).
State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2/13/04), this court stated the following regarding La.Code Evid.
State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , -80 , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), , this court stated the following regarding La.Code Evid.
State v. Wise 128 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Kendrick M. Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/1/03), writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04)
State v. Cox 124 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Elie 74 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , -80 , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/13/04), this court explained in pertinent part: In State v. Dunn, 01-1635, p. 21-22 (La.11/1/02), (citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the analysis for photographic evidence, stating: The State is entitled to the moral force of its
State v. Anderson 66 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), , this court explained in pertinent part: In State v. Dunn, 01-1635, p. 21-22 (La.11/1/02), (citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the analysis for photographic evidence, stating: The State is entitled to the moral force of its evidence, and post-mortem photographs of murder vict
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), (citing Schaffner, 398 So.2d at 1035 ) (citing United States v. Lee, 506 F.2d 111 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/13/04), this court found that the defendant’s “statement regarding his ‘thinking’ that he possibly ‘should’ speak with an attorney is not the type of unequivocal and unambiguous statement described above.
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Oliphant 980 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Deen 953 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
3d Cir.10/01/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), , a police officer asked the defendant, "Are you telling me you don't want to talk to me any more, John?"
State v. Allen 955 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , -175 , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), *750 , the Third Circuit upheld the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress his statement despite his statement to police officers while being transported that "he might he felt like he should talk to an attorney."
State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 10/1/03), , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2/13/04), in the event such evidence does exist, Defendant may develop it in an application for post-conviction relief; however, at this -30- point, Defendant’s claim lacks a factual basis and is denied.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2/13/04), the court discussed the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence as follows: [E]ven the erroneous admission of irrelevant evidence does not require a reversal of a conviction if the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 10/1/03) , , writ denied, 03-2913 (La.2/13/04), , in the event such evidence does exist, Defendant may develop it in an application for post-conviction relief; however, at this point, Defendant's claim lacks a factual basis and is denied.