No. 2004-CA-0707
Precedential
Processed
Whitney National Bank v. Goldsmith
Whitney National Bank v. Goldsmith, 913 So. 2d 124 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005).
Cited by
- Hunter v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 89 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Opinion text
LLOYE, J., dissents with reasons. I respectfully dissent. I find the trial court did not err in granting the Motion to Abandon for Failure to Prosecute. La. C.C.P. art. 561(B) mandates that discovery, in order to be designated as a step in the prosecution of an action, must be served upon all parties. The majority concludes that service upon Mr. Goldsmith, in his capacity as trustee for the Jason Charles Goldsmith Trust, was sufficient. I disagree. The codal article requires service on all parties; therefore Mr. Goldsmith should have been served in his individual capacity.