No. 2004-CA-1666
Precedential
Processed
Cox Communications v. Tommy Bowman Roofing, LLC
Cox Communications v. Tommy Bowman Roofing, LLC, 929 So. 2d 161 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006).
Cited by
- Huntsman International, L.L.C. and Rubicon, L.L.C. v. Praxair, Inc. La. 2025
- Rogers v. Integrated Exploration & Prod., LLC 265 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Pattridge v. Starks 189 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
- St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Guy Hopkins Construction Co. 108 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Brecheen v. News Group, L.P. 105 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co. 89 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- La Louisiane Bakery Co. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 61 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- SCENICLAND CONST. v. St. Francis Med. Ctr. 936 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Opinion text
TOBIAS, J., dissents in part and assigns reasons. hi respectfully dissent in part. I do not find that Cox Communication’s employment of Legier & Materne to verify whether Cox sustained any losses as a result of the 3-hour evacuation was unreasonable under the circumstances. The CPA firm’s determination was warranted lest Cox be accused by the defendants of fabricating or embellishing the calculated loss made by Mr. Elvin Thibodeaux. I would therefore award the $14,608.73 fees of Legier & Materne.