State v. Smith
State v. Smith, 885 So. 2d 513 (La. 2004).
Cited by
- State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
- State v. Thigpen 963 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189
- State v. Ducote 661 So. 2d 480
- State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State 665 So. 2d 1172
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. Writ granted in part; denied in part; sentence reinstated. The court of appeal lacked jurisdiction to grant the state’s writ. La. Const. art. V, § 5(E). Its judgment is therefore void. However, the district court erred in granting relief on a claim, raised by a motion properly considered an application for post-conviction relief no matter how captioned, that is: (1) time-barred, see La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189 ; State ex rel. Stepter v. Whitley, 93-2346 (La.10/13/95), 661 So.2d 480 ; and (2) not cognizable on collateral review, see La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 .