No. 2004-OB-0902
Precedential
Processed
In re Bleichner
In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112 (La. 2004).
Cited by
- Mark Shubert v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Faith Miller, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Jeremy Strahin, Jr. Versus … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- Sanjanette Rixner Versus Jefferson Parish Hospital Svc. District No. 2 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Carlos A. Juarez Versus Aj Lazo Construction, LLC, and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- Scott Clover v. Redfish Rentals, Inc. and Summit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- R & E Petroleum, LLC, Ragheb Chaar, & Elsie Aradi Versus Lkm Convenience, LLC … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- Stephen K. Lentz v. City of New Orleans, Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
- Patricia Goff and Mark Goff v. Dr. Robin L. Yue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Brett Buckner v. Dialysis Clinics, Inc. (Dci) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Joseph Demarest v. Ni Welding Supply, LLC & the Gray Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In Re Bourke 819 So. 2d 1020
- State v. Bourque 444 So. 2d 1208
- Application of Respondek 442 So. 2d 435
Opinion text
CALOGERO, Chief Justice, concurs. I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020 , citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.