No. 2005-B-0725
Precedential
Processed
In re Carter
In re Carter, 907 So. 2d 62 (La. 2005).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In re Carter 829 So. 2d 1023
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Chatelain 573 So. 2d 470
Opinion text
h CALOGERO, Chief Justice, concurs in part and dissents in part. While I agree respondent’s conduct warrants discipline, I believe permanent disbarment is too harsh for this already disbarred attorney. In re: Carter, 02-2066 (La.10/14/02), 829 So.2d 1023 (“Carter I”). I would find that the misconduct which occurred during the time frame of the conduct forming the basis of Carter I is encompassed within the disbarment sanction already imposed. See Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Chatelain, 573 So.2d 470 (La.1991). As for the misconduct that occurred thereafter, I would simply impose an additional period of suspension.