No. 2005-C-2562
Precedential
Processed
Andrews v. Trans Union Corp.
Andrews v. Trans Union Corp., 926 So. 2d 495 (La. 2006).
Opinion text
VICTORY, J., concurring. While I believe there may be some problems with the class definition adopted by the district court, my decision to concur in the denial of this writ is affected by the statement made by class counsel in its opposition to defendant’s writ to this court that it intends “upon remand, to request the trial court judge to modify the class definition, out of an abundance of caution, to ameliorate Judge Murray’s concerns.”