State v. Lee
Also decided on this docket: La., December 9, 2005 916 So. 2d 1037
State v. Lee, 925 So. 2d 1213 (La. 2006).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- STATE EX REL. SANDERSON v. State 916 So. 2d 1037
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. hUpon the State’s writ application, we granted certiorari in this case. State v. Lee, 05-K-0835 (La.12/09/05), 916 So.2d 1037 . After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of December 9, 2005, as improvidently granted, and we deny the State’s application. VICTORY, J., dissents and assigns reasons. WEIMER and TRAYLOR, JJ., dissent for reasons assigned by VICTORY, J.