Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kendall, 924 So. 2d 1013.

30 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Fitzpatrick P. Williams La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2/ 17/ 06), ( after considering several factors, jury reasonably disbelieved defendant' s story that he was attempting to disarm victim when " the knife cut across the victim' s neck"); State v. Guy, 95- 0899 ( La.
State v. Stock 212 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Carter 171 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 05/31/05), -03 , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Baskin 169 So. 3d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Abdul 131 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Wise 128 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2/17/06), the fifth circuit stated: Fairness is the standard of review for identification procedures and reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony.
State of Louisiana v. Shelwin Markise Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2/17/06), the fifth circuit stated: A defendant challenging an identification procedure must prove that the identification was suggestive and that there was a substantial likelihood of misidentification.
State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/31/05), -02 , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), , the fifth circuit stated: Fairness is the standard of review for identification procedures and reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony.
State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 5/31/05) ; , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06); .
State v. Tanner 109 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Bannister 88 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. BOITEUX 81 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Patterson 63 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Phillips 39 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Williams 30 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
App. 5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06)
State v. Mosley 16 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06)
State v. Babineaux 8 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/1/06), (prosecution met its burden of proving the homicide was not committed in self-defense where, even though defendant had more significant injuries than the victim, defendant was taller, heavier, and younger than the victim and did not attempt to retreat from the altercation.
State of Louisiana v. Gary Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/17/06), the fifth circuit held that Pagan’s specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm could “be inferred from the victim’s extensive wounds.” Moreover, the court noted that the inference of Pagan’s “guilty mind” could be drawn from his behavior following the stabbing.
State v. LaFleur 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/17/06), , the fifth circuit held that Pagan's specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm could "be inferred from the victim's extensive wounds."
State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05), writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), State v. Mackens, 35,350 (La.App.
State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), ; State v. Mackens, 35,350 (La.App.
State v. London 973 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Brown 968 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Richards 956 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2003 (La.2/17/06), ; State v. Mackens, 35,350 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Huey Lee Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
2/17/06), State v. Mackens, 35,350 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 951 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 5/31/05) , , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .
State v. Scott 939 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Thomas, 04-1341 (La.App.5/31/05), , writ denied, 05-2002 (La.2/17/06), .