Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kennard v. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co., 190 So. 188.

18 citing documents.

McClelland v. Jarrell's, Inc. 493 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Deville v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Guice v. Mustakas 490 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Co., (1st Cir.1939) were incorrect interpretations of Civil Code Article 3520.
Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 381 So. 2d 378 La. 1980
Flowers v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 367 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Kennard v. Yazoo & (La.App.
Landry v. Pierre Part Natural Gas Co. 344 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Wooden v. Hartford Ins. Co. 335 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Jackson v. Zito 314 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
[5] In Kennard v. Yazoo & , (La.App.
Tassin v. Allstate Insurance Company 310 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
As stated in Kennard v. Yazoo & (La.App.
White v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company 297 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Buvens v. Buvens 286 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Marathon Ins. Co. v. Warner 244 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
Kennard v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co. [La.App.], ; Peart v. Rykoski, Inc., 195 La.
Hunter v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCANATE WORD 236 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Kennard v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., *568 .
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Delacroix Corporation 235 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
583 (1937); and Kennard v. Yazoo M. V. R. Co., La.App., (1939).
Prather v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. 232 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Craig v. Montelepre Realty Co. 202 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
In the case of Kennard v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., , this court with the late Judge Ott as its organ, in discussing the doctrine of "contra non" stated: "Counsel for plaintiff bases his argument for the interruption of prescription largely on the rule `Contra non valentem agere non currit prescriptio.'