DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abshire v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co., 927 So. 2d 325.

24 citing documents.

  • Margaret Fisk Munro v. British American Oil Producing Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • Margaret Fisk Munro v. British American Oil Producing Co. 235 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Philip Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06- 585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: ....
  • Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 94 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: [[Image here]] In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability
  • Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06- 585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury:
  • Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden
  • Keith Smith v. Boise Cascade, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Smith v. BOISE CASCADE, LLC 34 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -801 (emphasis ours), writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Billy Ray Woodard v. Town of Colfax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Woodard v. TOWN OF COLFAX 29 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -801 , wits denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , we reviewed the standard of review and the claimant’s burden of proof in a workers’ compensation case: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: I.Jn worker’
  • Patsy Jane Boudreaux v. Able Supply Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Boudreaux v. Able Supply Co. 7 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Gregory Scott v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), addressed both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Scott v. City of Pineville 8 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , addressed both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • David Bailey v. Aecom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone
  • Shane M. Sartelle v. Footlocker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), -0636 (La.5/5/06), had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Sartelle v. Footlocker 996 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Hamilton v. Compass Group USA/Morrison 973 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writ denied 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-0585 11 (La.5/5/06), -0636 (La.5/5/06), had 12 occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden 13 of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed 14 accidents.
  • Lopez v. Town of Zwolle 963 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving *1043 unwitnessed accidents.
  • Timothy Butterfield v. Turner Industries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Butterfield v. Turner Industries 951 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden
  • Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United 939 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. *676 12/30/05), , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant's burden of proof in workers' compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Justin Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., United Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006