DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bryant, 950 So. 2d 37.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Duhon 270 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4th Cir. 1/10/07), (wherein the trial court was not required to personally inform the defendant of his right to a jury trial when the transcript revealed that defendant's counsel informed the trial court that defendant wished to waive the jury and proceed to trial by judge and that the trial court addressed the defendant personally and
  • State v. Williams 225 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.
  • State v. Mahogany 191 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), (noting that both the Supreme Court and this Court have rejected an absolute rule that would require the trial judge to personally inform a defendant of his right to a jury trial).
  • State v. Edwards 133 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Spurlock 129 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), (noting that both the Supreme Court and this Court have rejected an absolute rule that would require the trial judge to personally inform a defendant of his right to a jury trial).
  • State of Louisiana v. Letrakus Tyler AKA Trey Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Tyler 93 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), , this court noted that both the Supreme Court and this court have rejected an absolute *1189 rule that would require the trial judge to personally inform a defendant of his right to a jury trial.
  • State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 1/10/07) , , this Court again noted that both the Supreme Court and this Court have rejected an absolute rule that would require the trial judge to personally inform a defendant of his right to a jury trial.
  • State v. LANUS 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    App. 4th Cir. 1/10/07), -41 .